SE MII is meant to replace the Mig-21.
Rafale is attacked for its only 'flaw', which is not a flaw. The HMDS.
Dassault chose Reliance as its partner long before Modi came to power.
SFC chose the 36 Rafale GTG, not Modi, because of its ability to drop...
R&D spending is lower than procurement.
F-35's R&D spending is 60-70B, procurement spending is nearly 400B.
We are doing R&D on our own stuff also.
It won't be much of a fight. The Russians have only 4 Su-30SM and 4 Su-35 and just 1 battery each of S-300 and S-400, apart from a small naval...
Cranial capacity and IQ have no relation.
SAMs are treated using cruise missiles primarily. The Americans use Tomahawk for the same.
Development budgets are always smaller than procurement budget.
Drones require a lot of ground support, the aircraft themselves are cheap. That's...
Those are not force multipliers. Tankers, Awacs, satellites etc are force multipliers.
UAVs are definitely force multipliers. None of the stuff...
The UAVs are force multipliers. Can't compare it to everything else you have mentioned.
And we will get offsets.
Su-30 and T-90 were strategic deals, like FGFA will be. But Rafale MII has to come through a tender. So, go argue with the govt.
The tender will force Dassault to give a competitive price.
If we simply order Rafales outside a competitive process, Reliance and Dassault will...
I don't wanna bust Sancho's bubble, but at least I can tell you this. The F-16/Gripen purchase will not affect the Rafale deal. Rafale, Mig-35, SH...
Separate names with a comma.