Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

As China Upgrades Navy, India Misses Deadlines and Busts Budgets

Discussion in 'Indian Navy' started by AKIIN, Dec 24, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AKIIN

    AKIIN 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    129
    Country Flag:
    India
    As China Upgrades Navy, India Misses Deadlines and Busts Budgets
    [​IMG]
    New Delhi: India's new aircraft carrier, INS Vikrant (named after India's first carrier), has bust its budget by 600 per cent. It will now cost a whopping nearly Rs. 19,000 crore instead of the original estimate of about Rs. 3,000 crore.

    The warship, India's first home-built aircraft carrier, is presently being fitted out in Kochi and will be the Navy's flagship once it enters service in a few years.

    According to the Standing Committee's report, three major indigenous warship programmes are collectively a whopping Rs. 29,000 crore over budget.

    The three destroyers of the Project 15 class, the first of which, INS Kolkata, has just been commissioned, are about Rs. 8,000 crore over-budget. Similarly, corvettes of the Project 28 class, which are being constructed at Garden Reach in Kolkata, will cost about Rs. 8,000 crore instead of Rs. 3,000 crore.

    There are several reasons why these cost and time over-runs are taking place. According to the parliamentary committee's report, construction costs for the Kolkata Class destroyers went up because Mazgaon Docks, Mumbai, where the ships were meant to be built, was already constructing other ships. With a delay in the construction of the ships, the cost of materials went up and there was also a delay in the supply of warship-grade steel from Russia along with higher labour costs. Further, the identification and assessment of the costs of weapons and sensors was also delayed and the revised estimated was well over-budget.

    Similarly, in the case of the Project 28 corvettes, there was a delay in producing indigenous warship-grade steel, the development of which became a priority because of the massive costs associated with importing this grade of steel from traditional exporters such as Russia. The new, indigenous replacement, developed by the Steel Authority of India was complex to handle and required new techniques in welding. With a further delay in conducting trials of various systems from competing firms, the overall project costs escalated because of an increase in development costs and the decision to use new, state-of-the-art systems.

    Construction of the new aircraft carrier Vikrant also suffered because of the non-availability of warship -grade steel. Also, new technologies in constructing aircraft carriers had to be mastered. According to the Standing Committee Report, there was "inadequate domain knowledge" in carrier construction along with the emergence of new technological advances and new generation equipment which needed to be factored in. Most importantly, the report identifies that the government's sanction for the complex project in 2002 came "at a time when the form & fit (of) the warship was still emerging."

    The Standing Committee Report points to glaring lapses in the pace of indigenous warship construction particularly at a time when the Chinese Navy is growing at a very fast pace by inducting an entirely new generation of destroyers, corvettes and frigates. To match this, the Indian Navy needs to desperately induct new warships at a faster pace. In 2012, the government's Defence Acquisition Committee had approved 198 ships and submarines for the Indian Navy. The present force level is 127 ships and 15 submarines.
     
    Zeus_@21 and INDIAN NATIONALIST like this.
  2. Zeus_@21

    Zeus_@21 Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2013
    Messages:
    2,885
    Likes Received:
    1,288
    1)Recruitment process for scientists and Engineers is dubious. SC/ST/OBC quota shouldn't be considered for things like defense research rather it should be "best man for the Job".

    2) Corrupt practices must be there as is the case in every govt body. There might be kickbacks for sabotaging the in house projects within the top brass of our armed forces.
     
  3. AKIIN

    AKIIN 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    129
    Country Flag:
    India
    i dont know that why this committee made report of long delayed project under congress government and published in modi government. i think they forced by some one to display the truth behind the delays. may be this government take good discussion and start the private arm development hub.
     
  4. m2monty

    m2monty Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    232
    Country Flag:
    India
    Some strict actions should be taken by Parliamentary Board.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page