Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Did the British Really Divide India to Rule?

Discussion in 'National Politics' started by DrSomnath999, Aug 24, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DrSomnath999

    DrSomnath999 Major RESEARCHER

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,664
    Likes Received:
    1,512
    Country Flag:
    France
    By Maj Gen Mrinal Suman

    While studying Indian history in school days, one was repeatedly told that the British resorted to ‘divide and rule’ policy to gain control over India. The tone and tenor of such a description painted the British as unscrupulous schemers who exploited the simple, trusting and gullible Indians. As a young student one accepted the above statement at its face value without any questions and grew up in the belief that we Indians are a highly united lot and our subjugation was due to devious tricks and policies of the British.

    At a later stage, one started wondering why Indians let themselves be divided by outsiders and why they could not foresee the result of their disunity. Sadly, the truth is that our approach, attitude and practices have always been directed towards remaining disunited. Caste system divided the society in distinct segments. Presence of multiple religions, sects and sub-sects in the sub-continent prevented social cohesion.

    The much touted Swayamwar (selection of spouse by a princess in an open forum) is indicative of this deficiency and our total disregard for forging unity. Whereas matrimony amongst the royals in the Europe has always been an instrument of forging strategic alliances, Swayamwar invariably created more enemies than friends. All rejected princes and kings felt insulted, nursed a grudge and waited for an opportunity to take revenge to redeem their self-esteem. History bears testimony to the fact that every Swayamwar was followed by acrimony and internecine wars.

    Reverting back to the role of the British, they never divided us to rule. They did not need to do so. We have always been and continue to be a divided lot. Formation of states on linguistic basis was never attempted by the British. Mandal Commission was not constituted or implemented by them. Nor was the Babri Masjid demolished by the British.

    The current agitation in Maharashtra has not been initiated by the East India Company. Caste based reservations and quota system, the prime splitter of the Indian body politic, were not invented by the erstwhile rulers. Nor are they preventing us from enacting a uniform civil code. The list is endless.

    We have a knack and penchant for generating innovative issues to divide ourselves. We are doing our best to ensure that we remain embroiled in petty bickering and internal dissentions. To us, our region, religion, caste and sub-caste are more important. Worse, we flaunt this narrow identity and give it precedence over nationalism. If after 60 years of independence, Kashmir and the North East are still not emotionally integrated with the country, the failure is ours.

    Undoubtedly, the politicians are the fountainhead of all fissiparous tendencies. One does not have to be a visionary to predict the danger of abetting illegal migration from Bangladesh for garnering votes. North Indians in Mumbai are not welcome but illegal Bangladeshis can stay. If political leaders can imperil national security for the sake of power, they can stoop to any level. Sadly, they cannot be expected to change as they believe in the ends and not the means employed. To them, vote bank politics preclude letting countrymen stay united. Additionally, spineless and politicized bureaucracy simply follows their dictates and cannot be expected to deliver either.

    Immense damage is also being inflicted on the unity of the country by the media through its irresponsible and thoughtless reporting. For the sake of cheap sensational news, petty vandals are given the coverage befitting a mass leader. Every news item is reported with a religious, caste or creed slant – ‘a dalit girl molested in a Delhi bus’ (as if other women are not molested in Delhi buses) or ‘church guard killed’ (in reality an argument between two security guards had turned violent) or ‘muslim driver runs over a boy’ (his being a muslim is of no relevance). It is obnoxious to see articles spelling out proportions of different castes in a constituency and predicting victory of the candidate from the majority caste, thus promoting caste based politics.

    The Way Ahead
    If India continues to exist as a nation, credit will be due to three institutions – the armed forces, the higher judiciary and the Election Commission. They are also the only hope.

    As regards the armed forces, the nation owes its security, both external and internal, to its apolitical nature and nationalism. It is a symbol of national integration and a repository of best human values. It is an island of discipline and orderly behaviour in a sea of chaos and anarchy. A foreign observer wondered whether India deserved such a fine organisation. Unfortunately, concerted efforts are being made to demean and demoralize this shield between cohesion and disintegration.

    If an Indian citizen still respects law and believes in its fairness, the credit is entirely due to the independence and pro-activity displayed by the higher judiciary. Having been let down by the Parliament and the executive, people look at the judiciary as their sole hope. Therefore, it must step forward to shoulder additional responsibility, opinion of conservative constitutional experts not withstanding.

    First, anyone promoting hatred between communities or undertaking divisive actions should be punished for anti-national activities or even treason/sedition, as internal dissentions are the start point of all civil strife.

    Secondly, cost of all damages caused to public and private property must be recovered from the leaders of the vandalizing mobs with deterrent imprisonments. In case of fatalities, they should be charged with murder.

    Thirdly, any government found abetting disorder, both through overt support or tacit inaction, should not be allowed to stay in power.

    Fourthly, a blanket ban should be put on all religious processions and use of loudspeakers in religious places. In a secular country where religion is a highly emotive issue, it is best to shift all religious activities from public domain to private domain.

    The Election Commission can play an extremely important role with its constitutional powers. Any party that does not swear by the integrity of the country and equality of all citizens should be banned. Similarly, any party that promotes hatred amongst various segments of Indian society on any grounds whatsoever must be proscribed. Even religion-based parties which disallow followers of other religions as its members should have no place in a secular country.

    It is the duty of the Election Commission to ensure that political parties are not allowed to play vote bank politics at the cost of national cohesion. All defaulting parties and their leaders must be handed out exemplary punishment, debarred from standing in elections and their political careers sealed.

    The British controlled the whole of Indian peninsula with a maximum of 60000 troops. Today every state has a police force of more than that strength and yet divisive forces are rampant. If India has to survive and prosper as a united nation, it is time corrective action is taken. Let us not force the next generation to rewrite the history books to say that India can remain united only when subjugated by a foreign power or that an independent India is always a divided India.

    About the author
    [​IMG]

    Maj Gen Mrinal Suman is India’s foremost expert in defence procurement procedures and offsets. He heads Defence Technical Assessment and Advisory Services Group of CII.


    Did the British Really Divide India to Rule?
     
  2. DrSomnath999

    DrSomnath999 Major RESEARCHER

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,664
    Likes Received:
    1,512
    Country Flag:
    France
    For god's sake politicians plz see indians as citizens not as votebank.:feminist:
     
  3. Himanshu Pandey

    Himanshu Pandey Don't get mad, get even. STAR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    10,210
    Likes Received:
    4,220
    Country Flag:
    India
    there were difference among us but britishers used them to win over us and rule us... there were rivalries between kings but harmony among people... now rivalries exist in populace of all south Asian countries. this is because of britishers
     
  4. rocky.idf

    rocky.idf BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,829
    Likes Received:
    478
    Country Flag:
    Bangladesh
    Did the British Really Divide India to Rule?

    YES.
     
  5. Naren1987

    Naren1987 Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,647
    Likes Received:
    273
    And they taught the CONgress this art well.
     
  6. UNAM

    UNAM 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    57
    Yes British adopted divide & rule policy to rule but the same British united a vast divided mass of land into one.
     
  7. rcscwc

    rcscwc Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2010
    Messages:
    2,981
    Likes Received:
    593
    People were already divided, with muslims seeking hegemony and Hindus resisting them.
     
  8. Rudrakx

    Rudrakx Lieutenant SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2011
    Messages:
    963
    Likes Received:
    218
    Indians were already divided (in fact Indians were never united) , British only took the advantage of it and now its pseudo seculars .
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. TereBinLaden

    TereBinLaden Captain STAR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,174
    Likes Received:
    264
    so do you think, if opportunity given will your nation agree to join Republic of India?
     
  10. Praveen Taneja

    Praveen Taneja 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    60
    It was politicians who taught British how they can devide us in name of royality and viceroy etc awards and for that Nehru did a gr8 job
     
  11. Praveen Taneja

    Praveen Taneja 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2011
    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    60
    Even if they ready who the hell allowing a dying nation who is going to be a past in history as a nation to join

    even small african countries would say a big NO
     
  12. Averageamerican

    Averageamerican Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    15,359
    Likes Received:
    2,378
    Country Flag:
    United States
    Horse manure, you had problems between everybody befor the British and you will have them forever deal with it. Time you quit blameing the British and take responsibility for your problems.
     
  13. Naren1987

    Naren1987 Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,647
    Likes Received:
    273
    Divide and rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    The Brits just exploited the differences, just like our politicians do to this day.
    There were no Brits when Jai Chand betrayed PrithviRaj Chauhan, when Shilyaditya betrayed Rana Sanga, and when Mir Jaffar betrayed the Nawab of Bengal at Plassey.
    Indians have never worked for a national identity since the Gupta Empire.
    Time to do it now.
    When we were united at the Battle of Rajasthan, we beat back the Arabs, when rival noblemen betrayed each other, the entire nation paid the price.

    The Brits weren't the only ones to exploit these differences.
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2011
  14. G777

    G777 Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    1,284
    Country Flag:
    United Kingdom
    Not entirely sure what is being talked about but I do see the four letters appear a lot: B-R-I-T.

    You guys can explain to me if you want.
     
  15. Naren1987

    Naren1987 Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,647
    Likes Received:
    273
    There is some crazy theory taught in Indian schools that India was divided by the East India company, I can't explain in detail, but you can read the article .
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page