Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Getting Past Gandhi by Mediacrooks

Discussion in 'Internal Affairs' started by Marqueur, Jan 30, 2017.

  1. Marqueur

    Marqueur Peaceful Silence ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    11,317
    Likes Received:
    6,358
    Country Flag:
    India
    Getting Past Gandhi

    Abusing Lord Ram or Sita or any Hindu icon has now become fashionable among Commie Fiberals. Just read “The holes in the Mint” on the expletives showered on Hindu Gods. In the RamSethu case the Congress claimed in SC that Ram never existed. Sanjay Leela Bhansali wants to make a movie glorifying the romance of Allaudin Khilji and Padmavati under the silly claim that Padmavati was not a real historical character. If she wasn’t, how did she have romance with the murderer? And Hindus didn’t have a great history of recording history (quite a bit destroyed by invaders too) whereas the Commie Fiberals have a history of writing historical falsehoods. Bhansali was manhandled in a protest by Rajputs in Jaipur after they claimed the film-crew’s guards fired guns in the air and provoked violence. And the entire mafia screams attack on FoE.

    That brings me to ask why is this stupid FoE only a one-way street? You can abuse Ram, Shiva and ridicule all Hindu icons under FoE but speak facts about Islam or Christianity, you might end up in jail. Sample this one:


    [​IMG]

    Time and time again plays about Nathuram Godse have been banned.
    A new one is also being protested. Why? If Ma Durga as a “prostitute”
    is “alternative reading” for Commie Pigs… What’s their problem
    in a mere play about Godse
    ?

    Regardless of what one thinks of Godse, why should plays about him be banned. Why is there FoE only to abuse only Hindu Gods and historical figures? Bollywood glorifies mafia-murderers, including the recent movie “Raees”, but the Congi-Commies protest plays about Godse? Time and again books about the darker side of MK Gandhi have been banned. Why? Narendra Modi banneda book on MKG by Joseph Lelyveld claiming it alluded MKG was “bisexual”. So? You can abuse Lord Ram or Shiva but anything negative about MKG is blasphemy in this country? Our collective Dhimmitude over the propaganda and nonsensical myth perpetrated by Congress seems to be carried on by Modi even today. What is really infuriating is that some folks still peddle the fakery about MKG as if this great nation wouldn’t have been around if not for him:

    [​IMG]
    Like the TOI editor, many Fiberals tell us Gandhi founded this nation. This is absolute balderdash that must not be allowed to pass anymore. Even as the leader of the freedom-movement in its LATER stages, Gandhi was ONLY one among many. The British merely found an “adjustable” and “pliant” person in MKG rather than confronting strident warriors like Netaji Bose. I too hold the view that these long parades and military displays on I-Day or R-Day are not necessary anymore but I don’t see any connection of that to MKG whatsoever as TOI’s poor analogy claims.Fact is that MKG did not want India to have armed forces and neither did Nehru. Imagine what this would have led to. Nehru thought the Police would suffice and MKG did not want to be a part of anything that had armed forces. Dhimmifying the nation would be more like it:

    [​IMG]
    More and more people are now realising the fact that MKG is being over-glorified by the political and corrupt establishment and media for its own perverted goals. Dr. BR Ambedkar has been realistic in the fact that Netaji Bose was more of a threat to the British than MKG and was the real cause of a worn-out British leaving India:

    [​IMG]
    Gandhi was not a founder of this ancient land or country nor did he work to unite India. It would be appropriate to call MKG the “Founder of Pakistan” for conceding to the British the breaking of India for petty political greed of the Congress. Even there, MKG & Co failed India miserably with a half-hearted partition after Pakistan was created for Muslims. Leaving Muslims behind in India ensured the eternal perpetuation of communal fights which has now assumed an entirely different dimension of frequent conflicts. Hindu exodus from Kashmir, Islamisation of Bengal and Kerala, Islamification of UP and Bihar being work-in-progress and Hindus reduced to second-class citizens in many parts of their own homeland. MKG was a Communist patron of Muslims as much as Nehru and the Congress were and are. His politics and ideology is accurately plotted by this research group:

    [​IMG]
    The Communist-Islamic political alliance is now tormenting many democracies including the UK and the US. This is best explained in this video on how ISIS is using Commies to destroy Western culture and Christianity. In India, the Commie-Islamic alliance is sparing no effort in destroying Hinduism, Hindu customs and traditions and in some states killing the Hindus as well. MKG wanted to settle in Pakistan. That he is the patron-saint of Muslims cannot be in doubt if you look at his statements very closely:

    [​IMG]
    MKG is the Fountainhead of Muslim appeasement in India. A curse and burden that we suffer even today. He failed to condemn the Kerala Moplah massacre, supported Khilafat (What the ISIS now proclaims) and stood by the British despite extremely murderous acts like Jallianwallah Bagh in his misguided quest for non-violence. The British in turn mollycoddled him to prevent any violence should something happen to him. This same poster-man of non-violence had no problems sending Indian recruits to fight for the British but was averse to India having a military force after Independence. He wrote to Hitler like a great friend of his. He looked down up on Africans through aracist prism while claiming to eliminate untouchability in India. His advice to Jews to surrender to Islamic murderers is simply unpalatable.

    I’m not sure many would have heard of VO Chidambaram or many others like him who suffered and made great sacrifices for our freedom. Many have rotted in prisons or have died a horrible death. In contrast, the British-friend MKG had a relatively comfortable time in jails under them. The freedom movement had many heroes like Lokmanya Tilak, Rani Laxmibai, Netaji Bose and many many others. Yet, the nonsense has been perpetrated on this nation as if MKG was the sole torch-bearer of our freedom and has been given a fake title of “Father of the nation”. All this Congress propaganda and nonsense must now be thrown in the garbage can. There are many mistakes MKG has made and many of his decisions reflect a distinct lack of foresight and prudence. His transgressions in his personal life are also being written about now abroad if not in India. Although personal, MKG has only left behind fat heir-lumps like Tushar or Gopal who scavenge in his name as do the Chinese Gandhis.

    Regardless of all that, MKG did contribute a lot to the freedom movement and deserves most of the honours bestowed upon him but not falsehoods around him. It is now time that Indians moved away from the God-like pedestal given to him. It’s the same attitude that enslaved India for ages. The Congis were successful in enslaving India after the British. The US has many former presidents on its currency bills as also some of its “founding fathers”. Why should MKG be alone on our currency notes? We must start honouring other great souls too. MKG did not “found” India and nor are titles like “Father of the nation” appropriate”. On his death anniversary, I believe MKG himself would deeply resent the manner in which is name has been exploited and other freedom-fighters marginalised or are forgotten. Get past the God-like Gandhi created by Congress and respect him for his contributions. That’s all.

    Link http://www.mediacrooks.com/2017/01/getting-past-gandhi.html
     
    Agent_47, zebra7 and Darth Marr like this.
  2. vstol jockey

    vstol jockey Colonel MILITARY STRATEGIST

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,790
    Likes Received:
    15,448
    Country Flag:
    India
    In another thread, I had detailed how Gandhi was an agent of British who was brought in to ensure that British can exploit India during WW1 and retail India as its colony forever like South Africa.
     
    lca-fan likes this.
  3. zebra7

    zebra7 Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,229
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Country Flag:
    India
    Sorry to say but it was Gandhi ideology. He wanted to help British, so that they would give India its independence by getting the sympathy of British people. Why are you putting words such as agent of British. If still want to stay with your claim, prove it with facts.
     
  4. lca-fan

    lca-fan Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2015
    Messages:
    2,388
    Likes Received:
    4,777
    Country Flag:
    India
    Gandhi had done more harm than good for India.

    Had he be not there India could have got Independence way back in 1920s just after the WW1. During WW1 Britishers used Indians as cannon fodder to win war, had we not supplied them with soldiers which we did on Gandhi's insistence and in fact used these people to fight Britishers there would have been no choice for Britishers to Move out of India. Further had we got freedom in 1920s we would have got Akhand Bharat which would have included Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma (seperated in 1935) and Nepal too. I really don't like Gandhian thinking, it is self defeating and self inflicting.

    I really regret Nathuram Ghodse's late decision on Gandhi, had he or someone else done this in early 1930s then also India could have been saved of humiliation of dividation.
     
    vstol jockey likes this.
  5. vstol jockey

    vstol jockey Colonel MILITARY STRATEGIST

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,790
    Likes Received:
    15,448
    Country Flag:
    India
    What did Gandhi achieve in South Africa? He just managed what the British wanted. SA remained a part of British Empire with just the government passing on to few local people with rules and regulations common to people of Britain and SA.
    Gandhi came to India on the invitation of Congress and he was brought in to support the Home Rule league and Naram Dal of Congress which wanted to remain a part of British Empire with Locals being part of government. Congress demanded Poorna Swaraj only on 26th Jan 1930 in Lahore till than what were they asking for? Why did Congress demand poorna swaraj? It was bcoz of the targeted Killing of Garam Dal leader Lala Lajpat Rai in lathi charge and subsequent armed rebellion by Bhagat Singh, Azad and others. Gandhi was to ensure for the British that Indian people do not take to armed rebellion and remain non violent. Gandhi opposed SC Bose tooth and Nail bcoz he advocated armed struggle and Gandhi heaped on India Nehru as PM when whole of Congress had voted for Patel as PM. Why did Gandhi change the future PM of India and on who's bidding and for what purpose?
    British were very averse to Patel as he wud not toe their line and preferred Nehru who called himself a Britisher born as Indian. They knew that even after giving Independence to India, they will have their man Nehru ruling India. British dropped Gandhi as hot Potato after the Naval Mutiny in Mumbai and hurriedly left India to avoid being massacred by the very large number of Indian soldiers who had just retired from the service of Royal Army fully trained and armed as per Royal Army standards and well versed in their Tactics.
    Gandhi and Nehru delayed the Freedom of India and acted as agents of British.
     
    lca-fan likes this.
  6. vstol jockey

    vstol jockey Colonel MILITARY STRATEGIST

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,790
    Likes Received:
    15,448
    Country Flag:
    India
    Please include Srilanka to the list of countries which separated from India under the British when Gandhi-Nehru duo was leading this nation. They never opposed these moves of the British and actually supported them. Even the move to have separate electorate for Muslims was not opposed by Gandhi-Nehru combine while they did oppose separate electorate for dalits.
    The seeds of fragmenting India were sown by congress and Gandhi in 1930 the day the call for Poorna swaraj was made under pressure from Congress workers.
     
  7. lca-fan

    lca-fan Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2015
    Messages:
    2,388
    Likes Received:
    4,777
    Country Flag:
    India
    Very True. Sri Lanka was always a part of India.

    Actually, India stretched from Afghanistan (Bamiyan's Buddha statue, Hindukush the actual meaning of this word is shameful for us it actually means valley of Hindu's death and its older name is Gandhar and Gandhari came from here) to Bali and Sumatra where there are still Hindu temples, Angorvat world's largest hindu temple is in Cambodia). We have lost so much due to laxity and Idiots like Gandhi.
     
    vstol jockey likes this.
  8. Guynextdoor

    Guynextdoor Lt. Colonel SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    4,855
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    man you talk a lot.
     
  9. Guynextdoor

    Guynextdoor Lt. Colonel SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2010
    Messages:
    4,855
    Likes Received:
    1,740
    Like all the fire power of Arnub Goswami couldn't give the right wing the media power it demanded, then you don't deserve that power.
     
  10. vstol jockey

    vstol jockey Colonel MILITARY STRATEGIST

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,790
    Likes Received:
    15,448
    Country Flag:
    India
    @zebra7 asked me to substantiate what I wrote and I did that. If you have any counter view or question, please post it here and let us debate it. If shouting slogans like-India teray hongay tukday hazzar is called freedom of speech, we must not shy away from discussing Gandhi here.
     
    Marqueur likes this.

Share This Page