Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

If US Loses Important Indian Contracts,Upset Arms Lobby May Endanger Indo-US Relation:Larry Pressler

Discussion in 'International Relations' started by Agent_47, Oct 2, 2017.

  1. Agent_47

    Agent_47 Admin - Blog IDF NewBie

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,958
    Likes Received:
    5,856
    Country Flag:
    India
    If US Loses Important Indian Contracts, The Arms Lobby Will Be Upset And May Endanger Indo-US Relations: Larry Pressler

    Larry Pressler remains a diehard Indian lover and admirer. He has visited the country several times in the past decades but doesn’t seem to get tired of it as its multiple cultures, religions and languages continue to fascinate him. The ‘Pressler Amendment’ making a US Presidential declaration mandatory that Pakistan was not pursing a clandestine nuclear weapons’ programme before any arms transaction between the two countries could take place, had made him a household name in the sub-continent. Though many in India love to see him as “Delhi’s man in Washington,’ the 75-year Republican politician and former senator from South Dakota plead his commitment and mission is to the cause of nuclear non-proliferation. Currently in India to promote his book, Neighbours in Arms: An American Senator’s quest for Disarmament in a Nuclear Subcontinent– that will take him to Mumbai, Delhi and Chennai-- he took time off from his busy and hectic schedule to speak to Pranay Sharma. Excerpts from the interview:


    You are seen here in Delhi as “India’s man in the United States,’ is that a correct description?

    No, I don’t think so. I worked on nuclear non-proliferation worldwide and at that time we had the India-Pakistan focus. But I love India and come here a lot. It’s a great country, there are so many different people; so many different religions who live together. I am great admirer of the country and love coming back here.

    On the nuclear issue, you seem to be more concerned about Pakistan than India. What is the reason?

    That is because Pakistan is very dangerous and it is now developing nuclear tactical weapons, which is perhaps under the command of a one-star general. Since the North Korea issue there seem to have been some sort of renaissance in the United States on nuclear weapons. Pakistan is not a threat to the US but it is to India.

    Many experts see the Pakistani army as a disciplined force and feel the command and control structure of their strategic weapons are well defined….

    I hope so. But in my experience of dealing with Pakistan I and my partner, the Democrat Senator, John Glenn, have been lied to, the Congress was lied to and I think even President George H. W. Bush felt he had been lied to by Pakistan. It was difficult for us at that time because the military establishment was so concerned at that it felt it can get Pakistan to help us in Afghanistan but in my opinion Pakistan never really did much for us. So the whole thing is a bundle of contradiction.

    [​IMG]


    But why did a string of US presidents not share your assessment. Things only changed after George W. Bush came in support of India during the nuclear deal but before that American support was always for Pakistan?

    Yes, I think there is some truth there. In the old days and this was true till the 1980s that their generals and our generals were very powerful and the military-industrial state is very powerful—some of which I point out in my book. But some of it was out of necessity. If the Pentagon wanted to make a deal they could go to Pakistan and make it with one person, who usually was a general. But in New Delhi they will have to see the prime minister, the Lok Sabha; the media etc. The same kind of system you have in Washington where you have to work through your way to get your message across. But even at that time a lot of Indian parliamentarians and others that we would meet were pro-Russian. When President Nixon came here and met Indira Gandhi and the two did not get on very well. The point is at that time all this was all very new thing this warm, close relationship and government to government relationship was all very chilly.

    According to you India enjoys more “weight” than Pakistan with President Donald Trump. What has changed so drastically?

    Advertisement opens in new window
    I think we are in a retreat from trying to run the world as we have had so many setbacks and we also have a serious, internal budgetary problem that is bothering a lot of us. I think you will see the US receding in its desires to run the world and I would like to see India expand and increase its activities. So many things are developing in the way the US government now looks at Asia…

    How reliable is President Trump?

    He changes 180 degrees a lot of things he advocated in his campaign when he comes up to it. He has put a pretty sound administration though. On paper the resume of people he has appointed are pretty good. Some could argue that he has appointed one of the most competent cabinets ever with less political hacks in it and taking a businessman’s approach to it. He seems to delegate very well. On the other hand, he had very tense relations with the Attorney General who was his best friend and that shows he is quite unpredictable. But he may turn out to be a pretty good president contrary to his self-inflicting wounds and tweets.

    So he continues to have support in sections in the US?

    In the “fly-over” country—that part of the US where I come from and where people have an inferiority complex as they see most flights don’t stop there but head straight for San Francisco-- they like him. That is where you get to see the Trump phenomenon but that is also a step towards isolation and it will affect India and also Pakistan. But the North Korea issue has scared us on the nuclear issue. My mission here is to wake people up to say that probably Pakistan is more dangerous.

    Is the focus back on the nuclear issue?

    Yes, and part of my mission is to address this growing problem and convince people that we must go with India and have joint exercises or whatever it takes to get the Pakistanis to back down. Reports in Indian media suggest that Pakistan has already started backing down a little.

    [​IMG]


    How do you see President Trump’s Afghan policy? It has sparked off a lot of debates and speculations in this part of the world and perhaps, also elsewhere?

    I am not in agreement with President Trump’s policy. I am an actual Vietnam veteran, probably, the few you will ever meet. But I am against ‘boots on the ground’ so to speak from the United States point of view. And the reason I am because you cannot send an young man with a rifle, with no training in diplomacy and one who doesn’t speak the language of that country ande expect him to make friends. It doesn’t work. I am not a peacenik or an isolationist but I was against the Iraq war and the Afghan war as we fight it. I think Trump is falling into a trap. He is making sounds of sending more troops to Afghanistan. I think the best thing we could is to depart from Afghanistan.

    You have spoken quite candidly about the military-industrial complex and the various lobbying firms and groups that you called the ‘Octopus’ and its power in influencing US foreign policy. How effective are they?

    In most countries an ambassador will be able to hire a lobbying firm to push his country’s agenda. But one of the first things that ambassadors serving in the US do is to hire some influential law firms or lobbying firms to gain access to opinion makers. This is the only country where you have to do this and our ‘Octopus’ is perhaps the worst. But on the other hand I would say that we do need the military-industrial state to some extent. But ours has gotten way too strong. So the genius is to find a balance in public administration. But it is very difficult because your public servants or the Congressmen are supposed to make the decisions in the interest of their constituents and the foreign policy. A lot of this can be improved by involving university things or medicals things or agriculture. But what has happened is that mostly it has been concentrated on arms sale.

    So if the US were to lose a few big arms contracts in India will the relations suffer?

    Yes, the Octopus will get upset and react.

    How will they react?

    I am very worried how they might react. It might not be in the best public interest. We seem to be in a swamp, which President Trump wants to drain and that is how people feel about Washington—this whole money thing. This is what drives good, young people out of politics. It also results in bad public policy or public administration or bad foreign policy. And that could endanger our relation with India. We have to keep the Octopus fed.

    https://www.outlookindia.com/websit...arms-lobby-will-be-very-upset-larry-pr/302506

    @Abingdonboy @randomradio @PARIKRAMA @Hellfire @nair @Levina @BMD @Grevion @GSLV Mk III @Blackjay @anant_s @Ankit Kumar 001 @Zarvan @Picdelamirand-oil @BON PLAN @Sancho
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2017
    Sancho, Hellfire, BON PLAN and 7 others like this.
  2. sunstersun

    sunstersun Lieutenant IDF NewBie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2017
    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    352
    Country Flag:
    Canada
    I mean, did anyone expect anything differently? Military deals are as much about politics as they are technical.

    edit: arms deal with USA hurts Russia Indo relations. Arms deals with Pakistan hurts Indo USA relations.

    nothing new.
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2017
  3. ranadd

    ranadd 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    317
    Country Flag:
    India
    Did anyone expect it was otherwise???

    India had the chance to be part of the war machine through Afghanistan as well. Said no because of morals.

    Superpower 2020.
     
    Hellfire, PARIKRAMA, Wolfpack and 2 others like this.
  4. randomradio

    randomradio Colonel REGISTERED

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2013
    Messages:
    11,206
    Likes Received:
    6,312
    Nah, if the stuff America is peddling sucks, then we will tell you it sucks and that's the reason why we aren't buying it. During MMRCA, neither F-16 nor the SH were shortlisted and for good reason. If they didn't suck, they would have been shortlisted. I mean, there is no upper limit to how many jets could be shortlisted. We said the same to the Russians with their Mi-28 attack choppers when we chose the Apache. Requirements aren't up for debate.

    Let's not forget ToT. If there's no ToT for production deals, then contracts will never go forward. If the US isn't willing to provide ToT, then the ball is in the American court. It won't be our fault if the equipment is rejected even if it didn't suck because there will be someone else that will provide ToT.

    Our market is big enough for vendors to absorb rejection.
     
  5. sangos

    sangos Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Messages:
    5,136
    Likes Received:
    2,734
    Country Flag:
    India
    First - if one does not go without the invitation of the AFGHAN govt, it is called an invasion.
    Second - we are not in the habit of meddling in other countries' affairs certainly NOT a current friend like Afghanistan.
     
  6. WhyCry

    WhyCry Reaper Love IDF NewBie

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2017
    Messages:
    291
    Likes Received:
    386
    Country Flag:
    India
    I don't think US can't win anything except F16.

    The best they can work is on new technology cooperation under DTTI but that needs to address india's requirement.
     
    Hellfire and PARIKRAMA like this.
  7. Butter Chicken

    Butter Chicken Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2016
    Messages:
    1,053
    Likes Received:
    1,613
    Country Flag:
    India
    Exactly,India having domestic arms manufacturing capability is not good for foreigners.And we expect them to give us technology
     
  8. ranadd

    ranadd 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    317
    Country Flag:
    India
    Wrong on both counts.

    One - There are already Indian Armed forces in Afghanistan in Afghan government support roles. This is over the embassy attaches counts.
    Two - Invasion is over. US knows, Afghanistan knows. This is the rebuilding & peace keeping stage. India would have been paid to do this. Afghan government wants Indian forces there. There is a reason why UNPKF have less white people. And Yes, you may classify it as invasion. I wont hold you to that. However, we both knows things are not black & white.
     
  9. InfoWarrior

    InfoWarrior Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2017
    Messages:
    873
    Likes Received:
    708
    Country Flag:
    India
    What USA wants with India? = India becomes a proxy to needle China, cannon fodder to fight Taliban, weapons market, agriculture market etc

    What India wants from USA? = Transfer of Technology, Joint research, Investment, access to markets, etc

    The main goal of India should be to extract as much technology, investment, market access etc; never get carried away with things like Doklam. Play the Chinese against USA and vice versa.

    Remember USA once used Pakistan against us. I wish instead of buying weapons, ask Intel to build a 14nm Semiconductor fab in India.
     
  10. Angel Eyes

    Angel Eyes 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2017
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    152
    Country Flag:
    India
    You hit right on the nail...:yes:
     
  11. Agent_47

    Agent_47 Admin - Blog IDF NewBie

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,958
    Likes Received:
    5,856
    Country Flag:
    India
    This is no cold war era. With the emergence of China and India its a multi polar world. We serve our interest not others. When interests align we use it to our advantage with mutual understanding.

    Ever stopped to ask what USA whats ? Try looking from their prospective. They want business and market. They will reciprocate when they get those.
     
  12. sangos

    sangos Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Messages:
    5,136
    Likes Received:
    2,734
    Country Flag:
    India
    Disagree. AFAIK NO request has come from the Afghan govt in the context of the request of the US govt(Mattis). Earlier our train & arm programs as well as ITBP detachments were all deployed with full endorsement of the Karzai govt. As for your claims over invasion, the fact is NATO invaded Afghanistan( no UN authorization). And the legality of the post invasion Afghan govt approval of NATO invasion forces is debatable.
     
    Angel Eyes and Agent_47 like this.
  13. Averageamerican

    Averageamerican Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    15,359
    Likes Received:
    2,378
    Country Flag:
    United States
    Sounds fake from beginning to end.
     
    randomradio, Anish and Hellfire like this.
  14. Hellfire

    Hellfire Devil's Advocate THINKER

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2017
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    4,904
    Country Flag:
    India

    Could be.

    It may just be a 'playing to the gallery' sort of thing
     
  15. An Indian

    An Indian 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    198
    Country Flag:
    India
    I think we learned our lessons in IPKF. I'm hoping we don't forget those lessons - ever.
     
    Angel Eyes likes this.

Share This Page