Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

INS Vikramaditya Aircraft Carrier

Discussion in 'Indian Navy' started by tariqkhan18, Dec 10, 2011.

Tags:
  1. GSLV Mk III

    GSLV Mk III Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2016
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    1,866
    Country Flag:
    India
    Why stop with P 15B ? It would have a follow on class by the time we have a nuclear AC.
     
  2. Ripcord322

    Ripcord322 Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    602
    Likes Received:
    551
    Country Flag:
    India
    Hmm...That's possible
    When do you expect the follow-on class construction to begin...
    By what time wold tow of them be ready and kicking !?

    PS :I am curious about it...Is there a plan or a requirements on which the follow ons are to be built....I hope it's something like the Type-55...
     
  3. GSLV Mk III

    GSLV Mk III Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2016
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    1,866
    Country Flag:
    India
    There is not much info, but around 2022-2023, the slipways at MDL & GRSE will be free with all P 17A floated out.
     
  4. Sancho

    Sancho Lt. Colonel Technical Analyst

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    5,535
    Likes Received:
    3,373
    Is there any official source available, for the dimensions of the lift and the hangar of Viki?
     
  5. ashkum2278

    ashkum2278 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2017
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    240
    Country Flag:
    India
    A Tour of INS Vikramaditya by Russian Journalist


     
    Sancho likes this.
  6. Zer0reZ

    Zer0reZ 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2017
    Messages:
    229
    Likes Received:
    285
    Country Flag:
    India
    US Navy aircraft carrier team to check out India’s Russian carrier

    Underlining the navy’s growing closeness to the US Navy and its disillusionment with Russia, American members of a Joint Working Group (JWG) on aircraft carrier cooperation have been allowed to spend two days on board the Russian-built aircraft carrier, INS Vikramaditya, in Goa on Monday and Tuesday.

    The navy’s tilt towards Washington may not surprise Moscow any longer. But Russian eyebrows will surely be raised at US admirals visiting a Russian aircraft carrier, operating Russian aircraft.

    On November 3, the JWG will meet again in New Delhi to discuss taking forward US-India cooperation on designing and building an India aircraft carrier. The JWG was set up during President Barack Obama’s visit to New Delhi in January 2015 and has held productive meetings ever since.

    India’s navy has been scarred by Russia’s cost and time overruns in building INS Vikramaditya (formerly Admiral Gorshkov) and the dismal performance of the MiG-29K/KUB aircraft that Russia sold India as “sweeteners” to that deal.

    Given the robust contrast posed by the US Navy’s carriers and the F/A-18E/F fighters that operate off them, the Indian Navy has enthusiastically embraced the JWG as a platform for accessing American aircraft carrier design and operational expertise, which Indian admirals describe as “an eye opener for us”.

    India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC-1), called INS Vikrant, which is expected to become fully operational in 2021, incorporates Russian design concepts, such as a “ski-jump” for on-board fighters to take-off. But the second aircraft carrier (IAC-2), called INS Vishal, is almost certain to be based on US Navy operational concepts, such as a catapult assisted take off.

    One objective of taking the JWG members on board INS Vikramaditya is to assess ways of easing the Indian Navy’s transition from Russian carrier aviation concepts to those of the US Navy.

    Over recent years, the Indian Navy has conceived INS Vishal as a smaller version of America’s newest super-carrier, the 100,000-tonne USS Gerald R Ford, which was commissioned this summer. It was hoped that INS Vishal would be a 65,000-70,000 tonne, nuclear-powered vessel that launched aircraft with an “electro-magnetic aircraft launch system.”

    Called EMALS for short, this uses electro-magnetic energy to catapult aircraft to launch speed. It has begun equipping the next generation of US carriers, the so-called Gerald R Ford-class; replacing the six-decade-old steam-driven catapult that equips the Nimitz-class carriers that form the bulk of America’s carrier fleet.

    However, as this newspaper first reported (October 27, “Navy drops cherished dream of nuclear-powered aircraft carrier”) indigenously developing a reactor for a Indian aircraft carrier will take another 15-20 years. Even so, India’s selection of EMALS would allow the US a place at the design table.

    “Washington could well make the sale of EMALS conditional on designing IAC-2. They could cite the need to safeguard the EMALS technology and fitment from a designer who could potentially be a rival”, says a serving Indian admiral, speaking off the record.

    Business Standard learns that New Delhi is expecting US members of the JWG to carry with them a positive Washington’s response to a Letter of Request for EMALS that the defence ministry had sent last year.

    Any EMALS transaction would necessarily be a government-to-government sale under the US Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programme.

    A key question the JWG will discuss is how the enormous power requirements of EMALS – estimated at one GigaWatt – can be met without nuclear propulsion. The US designer of EMALS, General Atomics, argues that an Integrated Electric Power System (IEPS), which is the alternative to nuclear propulsion, can provide sufficient power.

    An IEPS consists of powerful gas turbines that drive electrical generators, generating power to turn the vessel’s propellers, as well as to meet onboard power requirements such as EMALS.

    While India’s navy has put its requirements at three aircraft carriers – one for each coast, while the third undergoes maintenance, repair and upgrades – the carrier-building programme has been marred by delays. The navy will operate a single carrier until IAC-1 is commissioned at the end of 2021. The third carrier would only become effective by 2030-35, according to current estimates.

    And it would then be less like the USS Gerald R Ford and more like the Royal Navy’s recently-commissioned aircraft carrier, the 70,000 tonne, gas turbine-powered Queen Elizabeth II, especially if the defence ministry turns down the navy’s EMALS request as excessively expensive.
     

Share This Page