Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Islam - a religion of peace or a totalitarian ideology

Discussion in 'Picard's Corner' started by Picard, Jul 1, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Picard

    Picard Lt. Colonel RESEARCHER

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,865
    Likes Received:
    3,024
    So where does the misconception about “peaceful Islam” come from? There are several main sources. Primary one is laziness – as shown before, Muslims themselves are often uninformed, and those who are not are more than willing to lie (and since informed Muslims act as shepherds for the rest, fact that many or most Muslims do not directly know about Qur’an’s murderous verses is not any reason for relaxing). Many thing that “Islam” comes from “al-Salaam”, which means peace. However, even the cursory reading of Qur’an shows that Islam actually comes from “al-Silm”, which means “submission” or “surrender”. This submission has two meanings: willing submission of a Muslim to Allah, and a forcible conversion of non-believers to Islam. This conversion takes two primary forms: brute force or passive pressure. Muslim “tolerance” of other religions in practice means discrimination: other religions are not allowed the same religious rights and freedoms as Muslims, have limited legal rights and have to pay a tax in order to practice their religion – a tax that is, for most, impossible to pay. And if they cannot pay, they are to be either killed or have their children taken from them by the tax collector. This applies only to Abrahamic religions: everyone else must either convert to Islam, or be killed by the followers of Allah. Further, intolerance is not limited only to religion: Muslim countries tend to be the most racist in the world. Other indicators are not very good either.

    Liberalism promotes plutocratic-friendly multicultural society, while at the same time closing an eye to all the difficulties such a society presents. Endorsement of Islam is simply an expression of that spirit – after all, as is clear all across the political spectrum, in a conflict between ideology and truth, former typically wins. By defending “another culture”, one viewed as oppressed, they show themselves to be true believers in liberalism. And Western liberals seem to hang on their misconception of peaceful Islam – even at the cost of their life. An Italian woman decided to hitch-hike from Italy to Israel in order to promote world peace. She made it to Turkey, where she was promptly raped and murdered by Muslims. More specifically, she was killed in the village of Gebze – mere 40 miles south-east of Istanbul. Muslim refugees have brought their culture of gang-rape with them – they believe that infidel women exist only for their pleasure – and only Russians (and an occasional Croatian) seem to be doing something about it. It seems easier to ignore that vast majority of Muslims either support or remain silent about terrorist attacks against the West – and to not speak against evil equals supporting it. Thus accusations of Islamophobia. „Phobia“ is an irrational fear or dislike of a particular thing or a group; an exaggerated fear. But to fear and dislike Islam is not irrational – not to do it is. Given the words of Qur’an and Imams, to dislike and despise Islam is the only rational course of action. Muslim imams and leaders in general are aware of it, which is why apostasy punishment is so harsh, and why sites such as faithfreedom.org are banned in Pakistan.

    A combination of increasing Muslim populace and money from oil-rich Muslim countries is endangering democracy in Europe. Voters give them power, and money acts as a multiplier for that power. Since primary concern of any politician is to get re-elected, politicians do not want to tackle the issue of Islam. Islamophobia is a term coined in the 1980s by Muslims and/or their liberal apologetics. Today, any negative statement about Islam, no matter how factually correct, is likely to be met with accusations of Islamophobia. But that accusation in itself is factually incorrect. “Phobia” is an exaggerated or irrational fear, and fear of Islam is not irrational – as explained in detail before. In fact, not to fear Islam is irrational – just as irrational was to appease Hitler. But liberals have not learned the lesson: appeasing the lion will only make him hungrier. Appeasing Hitler did not work, appeasing Islam will not work either. And Nazism-Islam comparison is the only one appropriate: both are ideologies created for the purpose of a war. Both are based around a single book (Mein Kampf / Qur’an) written by a genocidal lunatic. Both promote military expansion, genocide (especially against Jews), complete obedience to those in power. But Nazism still allows many more freedoms to ordinary people (those it doesn’t exterminate anyway) than Islam does, and is generally more liberal and civilized in its views. “Moderate Muslim” makes even less sense than a “moderate Nazi”. If a Nazi were to moderate his beliefs, he would become a nationalist, no longer a Nazi. Likewise, if a Muslim were to moderate his beliefs, he would become a deist, a theist, or a Christian; he could no longer call himself a Muslim, barring nearly complete ignorance of Islam on his part. But a person who calls himself a Muslim yet does not hate unbelievers, does not kill apostates and hate women, or at least support these actions, is not a Muslim; because these are (some of) the things that Islam itself demands.

    [​IMG]

    Islam is extremely xenophobic, aggressive, militant and totalitarian ideology with complete disregard for ethics. It is utterly self-absorbed, impossible to open dialogue with because it is convinced of its own perfection. It is not even an actual religion, but an expansionist and oppressive ideology, similar to Nazism (but worse – and in fact, quite a few neo-Nazis have converted to Islam, because they found it so similar to Nazism). Islam is a political ideology which merely uses religious cover as a shield to exploit religious freedom for political ends. One can either be a decent Muslim or a decent human being. Not both. The very moment a person embraces Islam, that person becomes evil – Islam is the only religion in the world where people become more violent the stronger they believe in it. But many – maybe majority – of Muslims have never read Qur’an in their whole life, and thus have illusions about their own religion. Some Western Muslims genuinely believe that Islam is a religion of peace and that Muhammad is the most peaceful man who ever lived. But while this ignorance allows them to believe in Islam while not being monsters, it also means that – in proper conditions – they are extremely easy to “radicalise”, because that is what Islam wants. Muslims that come from actual Islamic countries typically do not have such illusions, and are perfectly okay with using violence and embracing the worst aspects of Islam. There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim – there are only ignorant Muslims, who do not know Islam, and terrorist Muslims, who do know Islam. For this reason, many Muslims abandon Islam and turn typically to either Christianity or atheism immediately after they read the Qur’an for the first time – unless forced to remain (at least on surface) ardent believers by their fascist compatriots. Islam is a totalitarian, criminal, fascist ideology and it should be treated as such. At the very least, it should be outlawed within the civilized West – else West will not remain civilized for much longer. Reason for this is that Islam itself is a non-integrating religion, and even though some Muslims are willing to integrate, emergence of a liberal, integrated Islam is almost impossible. In a way, Islam is a religion of peace – people are most peaceful when they are dead, and if all humans die, there will be no more war. And while „bad“ Muslims want to kill everybody else, many „good“ Muslims are just praying that they succeed. Even those that do not do so, typically do not do anything to oppose them (except a protest here and there, but these are limited exclusively to the safe West, and do not happen anywhere where it would truly matter – these protests are nothing but a PR stunt). ISIL could never have gotten to power without at least passive support of majority of Muslims in the areas it controlled. Fact that they do nothing to either help or interfere with the “extremists” in no way reduces their culpability; they are still guilty of allowing something like that to happen. Any person who supports Islam is guilty of all the crimes committed in the name of Islam; and unlike citizenship of a country, leaving Islam is a personal choice. And “people supporting Islam” includes not only Muslims, but also Westerners that preach uncritical tolerance and make excuses for Islam. To tolerate evil is to support evil, and to support evil is to be evil. Liberals and Muslims alike have contributed to the rise of fundamentalism and terrorism simply by claiming that Islam is a religion of peace, by being Muslim and by defending Islam from any and all criticism.

    In fact, Islam has no characteristics of a religion, but all characteristics of a cult. Muslims are extremely zealous about their faith and have an unquestioning commitment to their Prophet. They are forbidden to question and doubt basic tenets of their faith, and dissent is punishable by death. Praying five times a day is used as a mind-control practice, to suppress any doubts about Islam. Muslim leadership dictates, in great extent, how members should act, think and feel (e.g. halal food). They become extremely violent if their prophet is slighted (to the point of murdering people), regard themselves as superior to anyone else, and when in non-Muslim country they lobby for preferential treatment (few caricatures of Muhammad resulted in an armed attack on Charlie Hebdo and violent protests; a crucifix in a jar of urine displayed in a New York Museum resulted in nothing more than a protest). Further, Islam has very strong inherent us-versus-them mentality, where all non-Muslims are viewed as enemies to be wiped out, and Muslims are encouraged to carry out violence in the name of Islam. Non-Muslim countries are viewed as a Dar al Harb, House of War, and war must be waged against them until they submit. Leaders, especially Muhammed, are not accountable to any authorities – Muhammed’s actions constitute law, and everything he did (rape, paedophilia, torture, genocide) is consequently not only allowed, but an ideal that should be emulated. Islam teaches that its “exalted” ends may be achieved by any means necessary. Suicide may be prohibited, but suicide bombing is a holy act because it advances the cause of Islam. Stealing from Muslims is prohibited, but stealing from non-believers is not. Sexual intercourse out of marriage is a taboo, unless it is rape of unbelievers, in which case it is acceptable. Lying is prohibited, except when it advances interests of Islam. Leadership uses feelings of guilt to control its members. Muslim converts are encouraged to cut ties with family and friends unless they as well convert. Muslims’ main goal is promoting Islam; anything else is secondary, and members are expected to devote unordinary amounts of time to the group and group-related activities. Members are encouraged to live and/or socialize only with other group members. Spiritual message in Islam is secondary to its totalitarian control over every aspect of followers’ lives. If God exists, then Islam is a blasphemy – against Him, and against all of His creation. If God truly was as evil as Islam portrays Him, He would never have created anything. But Islam’s God is nothing but Muhammad’s own alter ego, everything Muhammad wanted to be, but couldn’t. It is just a creation of a delusional, narcissistic psychopath.

    Today in Europe, Muslim supremacism is being called multiculturalism. It is forbidden to say that immigration creates schisms, brings terrorism to Europe, and that mass immigration from Muslim countries threatens Western culture with extinction – the same culture which created economically successful, free society which has attracted immigrants in the first place, and which those same immigrants want to destroy. It is forbidden to say that Muslim immigrants do not integrate, but rather create separate worlds and communes. It is forbidden to point out that Islam brings with itself a guaranteed intolerance, conflict and social division, but no diversity. It is forbidden to point out that immigration, multiculturalism and Islam are weapons that plutocrats use against nation-states, the last barrier against the perfect plutocratic world. It is forbidden to say that Islam is a tool used to create plutocratic United States of Europe. Brussels’ fanatical internationalism is aimed at crushing all resistance to neo-liberalism, and creation of multicultural society prone to divisions and conflict. It is forbidden to reveal that immigration, multiculturalism, internationalism and Islam are used to destroy anything that is independent from the world plutocracy. Opposing Islam is being labelled “hate speech”, even though Islam itself is the clearest example of hate speech in existence. Truth, democracy and responsibility are being sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism. After Islamic terrorism attack, media always employ a standard response. First sentimentalists are shown promoting „unity“ and „tolerance“. Then a good story is found among the rubble. After Paris it was reported that one of the suicide bombers at Stade de France had been turned away by a brave Muslim security guard. Story was a lie, but it promoted good feelings about Islam. In the next phase, media will ask questions that do not address actual problems. If a politician actually makes a good suggestion, media will immediately scream „radicalization“. Somebody will mention Palestine, and after a few days, nobody will talk about Islam. This is a consequence of excessive political correctness, itself a totalitarian ideology that has a lot of common with Islam – violent attacks against ideological opponents (i.e. everybody else) included. Freedom of expression – which also means freedom to scrutinize and if necessary insult somebody else’s beliefs – is in the basis of democracy, and indeed in the basis of freedom itself. Without such freedom, there is no freedom at all. Avoiding discussion for sake of not hurting somebody’s feelings is the wrong approach to take, yet liberal political correctness demands precisely that approach, and enforces it with totalitarian mindset. Islam is the only religion which outright promotes intolerance and hate. It brings out the worst in humanity, and teaches them to be obedient to worst of the worst people – because it is typically psychopaths that achieve positions of power. Basic tenets of Islam are murder, mutilation, psychopathy, murder, obedience, murder, intolerance, aggressiveness and murder. If it were not for the order to murder everyone undesirable – apostates, non-Muslims, political opponents – Islam would not exist today.

    But to point this out is “Islamophobia”. Apparently anyone pointing out dangers of Islam is mentally disturbed. Yet the term “Islamophobia” itself reveals a mental condition of people using said term. “Phobia”, by definition, is an “a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.”. But to fear Islam is not irrational, because Islam as an ideology is evil. It commands evil, and to not fear – or at least dislike – evil is itself irrational. The term “Islamophobia” is a type of cultural terrorism, a slander against anyone who refuses to tolerate the intolerable. It is an attempt to preventively create a feeling of guilt in any critics of Islam, and thus terrorize them into silence before, or as soon after as possible, they have said anything against Islam. It is just as logical to speak of “Naziphobia” as it is of “Islamophobia”, yet because Nazism is not an “exotic”, non-Western ideology, anybody crying about Naziphobia will be ridiculed. Anyone using the term “Islamophobia” is a traitor to humanity. Liberals and Muslims talk about numerous attacks on Muslims in the West – but most of these attacks are merely insults, many of them on the Internet. But as can be imagined, people brainwashed by egocentric ideology such as Islam are rather hurt by even minor insults. Accusations and very existence of “Islamophobia” are a badly disguised attempt, supported by the liberals, to impose blasphemy laws on the West. Accusations of Islamophobia have all characteristics of illogical ad hominem attacks, and as such discredit anyone using such arguments. The word itself was invented by Islamic supremacists as a way to silence critics of Islam and its inherent evils (including, ironically, intolerance). It is a scam, nothing more. In United States, there are ten times more hate crimes against gays and Jews than against Muslims. In France, in 2014. there were 851 hate crimes motivated by anti-Semitism, and 133 hate crimes against Muslims. Out of 148 violent attacks, 122 were motivated by anti-Semitism, and 7 by anti-Muslim feelings. Needless to say, most anti-Semitic attacks are caused by Islam. Two young Muslims in 2011. drove 13.000 miles around the America, and were welcomed wherever they went. Compare this to an incident in 2008., when an Italian woman that tried to hitch-hike her way from Italy to Israel to promote the message of peace and love. She was raped and strangled in Turkey, just few miles South-East of Istanbul. As cited by an article written about the case, “The performance piece, a trip through nearly a dozen countries in the Balkans and the Middle East, many of them ravaged by war recently, was meant to underscore that “by overcoming differences and lowering the level of conflict,” individuals and cultures could come together, Ms. Moro said in a telephone interview. “Meeting people was the key.””. She easily made it through “backwards, nationalistic” Balkans only to be murdered in “secular” Turkey. Her body was found in a dumpster near the city of Gebze, merely 40 miles south-east of Istanbul. Yet liberals pretend that this has nothing to do with Islam’s treatment of women as mere objects, existing to be raped, and draped in black bags to prevent uncontrollable Muslim males from raping them.

    Liberals and Islamists like to call anyone opposing Islam and multiculturalism to be a “racist”. Yet Islam is not a race, it is an ideology – no different from Nazism, except far worse. According to liberal definition of racism, then, antifascists who fought against the Axis in the Second World War would also be racists, because they opposed an ideology, and should thus be despised. But that does not matter to liberals; to them word “racist” is merely a weapon to discredit their ideological opponents without having to resort to argumentative debate. Yet people who see racism everywhere are typically racists themselves; they patronize other races, and often hate the white race for evils that stem from ideologies, not race – evils of which Islam is just as guilty of, if not more guilty than, any European-origin ideology or nation, or group of ideologies or nations. By patronizing other races, they engage in racism, and deny said races right to self-development. Liberal ideology defends Islam merely because it is an ideology that does not originate from Europe or from people of European origin, in spite of all its evils; how is that for racism? Liberals (progressives) measure a person first and foremost by the colour of their skin; but in their warped world, being racist towards the white people is not racism, and Islam – itself a racist ideology, at least by liberal definition – is given a free pass because most of its followers are not white. Mormons are ridiculed by liberals in ways that Muslims never would be, because they are predominantly white. To progressives, being born in a first world is a sin – and they try to get rid of that sin by turning the first world into a third world, via Muslim immigration. Muslims are never guilty; no matter what they do, liberals, somehow, always shift the blame to the non-Muslims. According to Muslims, rape victims are guilty because they did not cover themselves head-to-toe; according to progressives, victims of Islam’s terror are guilty because they have provoked the Muslims. Fact that the “provocation” in question is merely existing is, to them, irrelevant. Apparently, such patronization of non-whites (or more specifically, non-Westerners) is, to liberals, perfectly okay, because liberals want and need to feel superior; this superiority complex is something that liberals and Muslims have in common. The ultimate insult for progressives is when the truth does not confirm to their world-view (as it is for any ideology). Progressives refuse to understand that not all cultures are equal; some are worth preserving, and some are danger for humanity and should be destroyed. They also refuse to understand that black-skinned people can be just as racist as the whites. They go mental at the idea that nobody has the right to censor anybody else’s opinion, no matter how hurt their feelings may be. They, just like the Muslims, aggressively silence anyone who disagrees with them. In fact, progressives often display – especially when it comes to the topic of Islam – a cognitive dissonance typically associated with religious beliefs. They claim to be fighting for human rights, but when it comes to most fundamental and important of all human rights – the freedom of expression – they do everything they can to stamp it out, labelling it “hate speech”. Example of that is a Sweden – what once used to be a country is now a war zone and an insane asylum, rolled into one. A Swedish politician was convicted of a “hate speech” for correctly connecting Muslim immigration to high levels of rape. The court said that it did not matter that what he said was true, or that it could be proven to be true, it was enough that it caused a potential offence to Muslim immigrants. It does not matter that Muslim immigration has turned Sweden from the safest country for women in the world into a rape capital of Europe (with twice the rape rate of the next country), or that Jews had to leave because Muslims would have attacked them. It does not matter that almost all rape crimes in the neighbouring Norway are committed by Muslim immigrants. Political correctness has turned Sweden into totalitarian, (Islamo)fascist police state. Anyone voting for the only party that is against Muslim immigration is treated like a Nazi voting for Satan, when the only Nazi Satan around is Islam itself. Swedish government had changed the Constitution without consulting the people, in order to better accommodate Islamofascists, so that a person no longer has to be Swedish citizen to hold an important office, and Swedes are constitutionally required to practice multiculturalism. Muslim (economic) immigrants from relatively safe countries stay in Sweden, while Christian refugees are sent back to Iraq to be butchered like pigs. In England, English Defence League is considered “far right”, “fascist” and “racist”, yet it opposes fascism and racism (but apparently, opposing Islamic fascism and racism is fascist and racist). In Western universities, students brainwashed with ideology often shout down the speakers that they disagree with. And people see nothing wrong with it, as long as it happens only to people who do not share the so-called “progressive” consensus. Just like all the other useful idiots, who let their ideology dictate their reality instead of the opposite, they are afraid of anything that would rock the foundations of their castle on a cloud. Especially of the truth; but that is a normal reaction of people who are emotionally invested in a lie. Liberal ideology of political correctness is no different from the Creationism; equally irrational and baseless, the only difference being that creationism is far more benign. Liberals are too busy crying about “racism” and the rise of the “far right” and “nationalism” (as if nationalism is something bad) to notice a blood-red Allahphant in the room, about to go on a murderous rampage, all thanks to the multicultural nightmare they had imposed on the West.

    [​IMG]

    But that is cowardice. Real reason why Islam is so defended by the progressives and the media is because said people are cowards. They are afraid. Afraid of Muslim violence and murder, afraid of conflict and danger. Afraid, of having to admit to themselves, that multiculturalism and tolerance sometimes do not really work. Afraid, of having to realize that not all cultures are equal, and that some cultures are a danger that has to be destroyed. Afraid, of actually having to stand up and fight for the values they profess to hold so dear. Afraid of the truth, because truth offends Islam, and when Islam is offended, violence follows. But media have the responsibility to the society at large; truth is necessary for freedom, and if journalists and media organizations sacrifice truth for the sake of safety, they are committing high treason against the society they are supposed to serve. Today’s people are cowards, and Western Europe has already caved in to Muslim cultural terrorism. Cowardice is dressed in nice terms such as “tolerance”, “respect” and “multiculturalism”, and people are so afraid they are ignoring the problem, hoping it will go away. They are afraid of doing what needs to be done, worse, they are afraid of even acknowledging that there is a problem at all. Europe today, at least the Western Europe, lacks spine, brain and heart; it is on a course to imminent self-destruction. And the left-wing “progressives” will defend that lack of critical organs – with violence, if necessary, because truth is frightening. And the truth is that with Muslim immigration, Europe is headed towards a civil war and death, of culture, of humanism and of democracy.

    Islam itself is a totalitarian ideology, *the* most comprehensive totalitarian ideology which has ever appeared, and thus perfect for controlling people. Islam is against critical thought, individuality, human rights… in other words, it is against all the things that are actually dangerous for capitalists controlling the West. Islam and multiculturalism are being used as weapons against working class in the West, but neither the so-called “right” nor the so-called “left” see it, and any socialism on national(istic) basis, which is the only ideology actually dangerous to capitalists, is pre-empted by cries of Nazism (and Nazis themselves, ironically, were corporatists, not actual socialists). But neither the so-called “right-wing” nor the so-called “left-wing” political parties recognize this, because they themselves are controlled by capitalists, much like Hitler was.
     
    Ankit Kumar 001 likes this.
  2. Picard

    Picard Lt. Colonel RESEARCHER

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2012
    Messages:
    5,865
    Likes Received:
    3,024
    What are the possible solutions? First, immigration from Muslim countries must be strictly limited as immigrants prevent Muslims already in Europe from adapting to the society, and in any case society can only process a certain number of immigrants, even when immigrants come from a culture that is not actively hostile to the home society. Immigrants, before being allowed in, must pass screening tests where they show that they understand values of the society they are entering; they should also be sterilized. Religious schools and home-schooling must be abandoned or forbidden; compulsory citizen schooling has to be enforced for everyone. Arranged marriages have to be forbidden, and in the case they are carried out anyway, the whole family ought to be deported to a Muslim country the spouse comes from. Western laws and customs have to be enforced even in Muslim-majority areas. Death sentence should be introduced for crimes such as murder and rape, both of which are used as tools for spreading Islam. Next, Islam itself has to be stopped. West has to stop buying oil from Muslim countries, in order to cut off the flow of money to terrorists who attack the West (this will require researching alternative energy sources, e.g. fusion reactors). Muslim Imams have to be forbidden access to schools, college campuses, armed forces and prisons. Truth must be opposed to Muslim lies. Finally, Islam must be criminalized, much like other totalitarian/genocidal ideologies. Muslims that refuse to accept European culture and values, which includes converting from Islam to another religion (or no religion), and instead riot in the streets, have to be deported into the Muslim countries, with no possibility of going back to Europe. Those that do not riot have to be treated the same way Muslims treat non-Muslims: second-class dhimmis, heavily taxed and with no civil rights. Muslim children should be taken from their families and raised by state in a secular, atheistic environment. Muslim countries have to be isolated from the rest of the world and then left to their own devices, to self-destruct in constant violence inherent in Islam, waging jihad against each other, lest they grow powerful and delusional enough to trigger a nuclear war with the West; West for its part must not allow itself to loose massive advantage it has in nuclear warheads over the Islamic world, nor to allow itself to become part of the Islamic world. Islam itself is evil, and to tolerate evil is to support evil – a lesson that Europe should have learned in World War II, but has apparently failed to do so. In the long run, the only answer is to stop the immigration from Muslim countries, and kick out anyone causing trouble.

    Unless Islam is gotten rid of, the only possible outcome is another world war, albeit different in nature – where World War I was caused by imperialism, World War II was caused by liberal capitalism, World War III will be caused by a combination of multiculturalism and Islam. But that is likely what Western plutocrats want, a war that will enable them to roll back the progress of democracy, while at the same time creating a “multicultural” mass without identity that will be easy to rule over. Nationalism is the only true “religion”, it is a prerequisite for democracy, and that is why plutocracy uses multiculturalism and Islam – a war ideology where loyalty to religion is more important than loyalty to nation – to destroy nationalism and, consequently, democracy (Turkey only achieved democracy once, under Ataturk, national loyalty became more important than Islamic one). Islam cannot be reformed. With “civilized” Islam, there is always a possibility of believers discovering “old-school” Islam somewhere, as is indeed happening non-stop in Europe, and that is a risk which cannot be taken. In fact, if one takes away all the bad aspects of Islam – genocide, aggressive separatism, intolerance, supremacism, special pleading, egoism, narcissism, misogyny, psychopathy, hatred, censorship, violence – there is nothing left. Doing so would transform Islam into general theism. West has already tried controlling and undermining Islam through usage of Muslim pop-culture icons and capitalist Islam as a means to override classical, political Islam. It worked for a while, but then it backfired, with Muslims – pop icons included – reverting back to the political Islam. It doesn’t work simply because Muslims believe that their original society – which they ran away from – is superior simply because it is Islamic. Islam is rigid as a fossil. In the end, the only permanent solution – one which may guarantee that there will be no reversal to actual genocidal ideology – is the destruction of Islam and its replacement with another ideology (such as nationalism, or Christianity adapted to nationalism). Where Islam comes, it stays, unless displaced by force. And because Islam is an ideology of hate which goes directly against principles of democracy and state, and threatens state by placing God above it, it cannot be tolerated. Nothing which threatens the purpose and existence of state can be tolerated. Respecting beliefs is only fine as long as they don’t cause harm; Islam has to be eradicated. But ideology can only be fought by another ideology, such as nationalism and/or Christianity. Ideology can’t be fought with lack of ideology, or with decadent ideologies such as liberalism and materialism; least of all Islam, a satanic cult made up by an illiterate psychopath from 7th century Arabia.

    “Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

    – Manuel II Paleologos

    “What is wrong with inciting intense dislike of a religion if the activities or teaching of that religion are so outrageous, irrational or abusive of human rights that they deserve to be intensely disliked.”

    – Rowan Atkinson
     
    Ankit Kumar 001 likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page