Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Make-in-India: Plan to develop 5th-generation fighter aircraft

Discussion in 'Indian Air Force' started by ricky123, Jan 8, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ricky123

    ricky123 Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,051
    Likes Received:
    352
    Country Flag:
    India
    NEW DELHI: India plans to kick-off its own fifth-generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) development project this year to build on the expertise gained in the long developmental saga of the indigenous Tejas light combat aircraft.

    Top defence sources on Wednesday said the preliminary design stage of the futuristic fighter called the advanced medium combat aircraft (AMCA), with collaboration among IAF, DRDO and Aeronautical Development Agency, is now "virtually" over.

    "Once the project definition and feasibility is completed in the next few months, the defence ministry will go to the cabinet committee on security for approval. It will require Rs 4,000-5,000 crore for the initial design and development phase," said a source.

    The aim is to fly the first twin-engine AMCA prototype by 2023-2024, which will be around the time deliveries of Tejas Mark-II fighters will be underway. IAF is slated to get its first Tejas Mark-I in March this year, over 30 years after the LCA project was first approved in August 1983. But the Tejas Mark-II jets, with more powerful engines, will start to come only by 2021-2022, as was first reported by TOI.

    "After Tejas-II, we have to move ahead to a fifth-generation-plus AMCA. Basic design work of AMCA as well as presentations by five to six global aero-engine manufacturers is over. Simulation modelling is also in the works," said the source.

    India, of course, is also trying to sort out its differences with Russia over their proposed joint development of the Indian "perspective multi-role fighter" based on the latter's under-development FGFA called Sukhoi T-50 or PAK-FA.

    [​IMG]

    India, in fact, had told Russia it cannot wait till 2024-2025 to begin inducting 127 of these single-seat fighters, which will entail an overall expenditure of around $25 billion. But India also wants its own home-grown AMCA project in the long-run for strategic and economic reasons.

    A swing-role FGFA basically combines advanced stealth, supercruise (capability to achieve supersonic cruise speeds without use of afterburners), super-maneuverability, data fusion and multi-sensor integration on a single fighter.

    But the 20-year long development of the American F/A-22 "Raptor", the only fully-operational FGFA in the world today, has shown that such a project is an extremely complex and costly affair.

    The US shut down the production of Raptors in 2012 after inducting 188 of them at an overall cost of $67 billion due to huge costs, technical glitches and time overruns. The US is now finally moving towards operationalizing a more advanced FGFA, the F-35 "Lightning-II" joint strike fighter. With the project yet to overcome all technical and software glitches, the overall cost for the planned induction of almost 2,500 such fighters stands at around $400 billion.
     
    sangos likes this.
  2. Bismarck

    Bismarck BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    2,435
    Likes Received:
    799
    Country Flag:
    India
    My suggestion to India will be to consider designing AMCA for primarily the Naval forces because if you see for the IAF there is already Super Su-30, there is Tejas II LCA and PAKFA (considering that Rafale is refused) thus in a way the 5th Gen requirement will be taken by PAKFA/FGFA which will then take the role of Air dominance along with Su-30 MKI. Su-30 MKI will take the role of Deep strike and air dominance. LCA will take the role of air interception and short range attack to support IA at battalion level.

    the Indian navy on other hand does not have much besides MiG-29K and LCA-N as of now, thus it would be better if AMCA project is done using specifiations for a Naval fighter. There are few advantages, If the plane is designed as Naval plane then it is stronger and powerful, and it is easier for designers also, as its much easier to convert a Carrier borne Naval fighter into Land based plane, but converting a Land based plane to carrier based plane will be similar to redesigning plane and will take more extra time.
     
    Zeus_@21 likes this.
  3. sangos

    sangos Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2013
    Messages:
    5,130
    Likes Received:
    2,729
    Country Flag:
    India
    This taking the bull by the horns. Bold move considering the difficulty and timeline.....next level 6th Gen!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page