Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

'NIA failed to gather evidence against Lt Col Purohit'

Discussion in 'National Politics' started by DaRk KnIght, Jun 21, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DaRk KnIght

    DaRk KnIght Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Apr 14, 2010
    Likes Received:
    In a controversial twist, the National Investigation Agency has NOT named Col Prasad Srikant Purohit as one of the main conspirators in the charge sheet of Samjauta bomb blast case that was given to the media on Monday.

    The blast on Samjhauta Express, which runs between Delhi [ Images ] and Lahore [ Images ], killed 68 people on February 18, 2007.

    The NIA's claim is intriguing, "Sandeep Dange, Ramji, Lokesh Sharma and others -- under the leadership of Sunil Joshi -- were instrumental in not only procuring the raw material for IED but also getting these fabricated and planted in the target."

    A prominent weekly had carried a report filed by the NIA in April 2011 on the blast cases in Malegaon, Ajmer and Samjauta Express to the Home ministry that said, "The attacks in Ajmer Sharif, Mecca Masjid and Samjhauta are likely to have been carried out by the same group."

    The 'group' included Purohit's name.

    But, now NIA's chargesheet suggests that they failed to gather evidence against Purohit. According to a senior CBI official, Colonel Srikant Purohit is NOT involved in the Samjauta Bomb blast.

    While talking exclusively to rediff.com on the condition of anonymity, he said, "Neither the CBI nor the NIA could find evidence to link Purohit to the Samjauta blasts case."

    The CBI official believes that Purohit had links with radical groups, or maybe he was making money beyond his stated income. But neither of the investigating agency could link him to the Samajauta blasts.

    However, it should be noted that in November 2008, the Maharashtra [ Images ] Anti-Terrorist Squad had told a Nashik court that Purohit had stolen 60 kg of RDX from Jammu & Kashmir [ Images ] in 2006.

    It was reported, then, that some part of the stolen RDX was suspected to have been used in the Samjhauta Express blasts. After they were published, police officials from Haryana and Mumbai [ Images ] too quizzed Purohit, but even they could not link him to the Samjhauta blasts.

    Moreover, the Maharastra ATS too, could not prove the charges in the court and stopped repeating the allegations.

    In 2008, Purohit, a serving officer of the Indian Army [ Images ], was accused of conspiracy for terror and murder and having links with a Hindu radical group that planned and executed bomb blasts in Malgaon, Ajmer and the Samjauta Express.

    His arrest in 2008 had sent shockwaves, because it was the first time ever that a serving officer was accused of an act of terror.

    In the chargesheet filed before the Special Court in Panchkula, Haryana, the NIA has accused Aseemanand, Sunil Joshi, Lokesh Sharma, Sandeep Dange and Ramchandra Kalasangra alias Ramji, but not Purohit.

    Purohit is facing serious charges for stealing 60 kg of RDX from the Army, which was used by the Hindu radical group, claims the chargesheet filed earlier.

    In fact, CBI's record had explained how after the murder of Sunil Joshi, Aseemanand had called up Purohit to make "confession" to him about his involvement along with Joshi in the Ajmer Sharif bomb blast.

    Aseemanand asked Purohit to find out who had murdered Joshi in Dewas. This telephone conversation has been corroborated by Purohit, Ajay Rahirkar, Sameer Kulkarni, etc, claims CBI.

    It seems that the NIA chargesheet is heavily depending on Assemanand's confession.

    Purohit is accused of being among the founder members of Abhinav Bharat, a then-obscure group. Assemananda had confessed that he had proposed the terror strikes in a group meeting at Bhopal in April 2008.

    Sadhvi Pragya [ Images ], Bharat Riteshwar, Purohit and Dayanand Pandey were in the meeting, too, a source said.

    Aseemanand told the CBI that Purohit told him about the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh leader Indresh Kumar's alleged link with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence, the source added.

    Purohit had learnt of the same from Dr RP Singh [ Images ], Aseemanand told the CBI. Dr. Singh had contacts with some people in Nepal who shared these details with him. This aspect had greatly disturbed Purohit and Aseemanand.

    It's believed that the former chief of Mumbai ATS, the late Hemant Karkare [ Images ], had shared this detail with RSS leaders and even with few Maharastra-based Bharatiya Janata Party [ Images ] leaders.

    The leaked synopsis of the Samjauta Express blast chargesheet has not thrown any light on details of the RDX or other explosives procured by the radical terrorists.

    A source said that Assemanand, one of the prime accused, was not capable of getting explosives on his own. According to NIA, Joshi was the prime operational terrorist who was charged on Monday, long after his murder, of the serious act of terrorism.

    'NIA failed to gather proof against Col Purohit' - Rediff.com India News


    Jun 3, 2011
    Likes Received:
    Country Flag:
    interesting development. i wonder how it will be viewed in pakistan? will it be seen as indian attempt to clear name of its army personnel from alleged links with hindu terror groups? or will be seen as a move to stop army's image getting spoiled?
  3. Rudrakx

    Rudrakx Lieutenant SENIOR MEMBER

    Apr 30, 2011
    Likes Received:
    I don't give shit about Pakistani view but our own media harassed Lt Col. Purohit and his family. Purohit was arrested in connection Malegaon blast case and not for Samjaita blast. State investigation agencies miserably failed to provide any solid proof against him and others , that's why the case was given to CBI/NIA and all arrests made in case of Malegaon blast so they could use MCOCA under which it is almost impossible to get bail. This is how they are going keep this "Hindutva terror" alive !
  4. rcscwc

    rcscwc Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Dec 24, 2010
    Likes Received:
    Inspite of the all out efforts to frame Purohit there is no evidence against him. Same is likely to be the case about other accused.
  5. Karthic Sri

    Karthic Sri <b>STAR MEMBER of the MONTH</b> SENIOR MEMBER

    Apr 15, 2010
    Likes Received:
    No surprises here.

    The same will ultimately happen in the case of Swami Aseemanand as he had already said his confessions were under extreme duress and the entire case is built on that "confession".
  6. JanjaWeed

    JanjaWeed Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Oct 13, 2010
    Likes Received:
    NIA will not find anything against Aseemand either. This was just a politics of opertunism played by UPA to serve their own reverse communal agenda & to defame their political opponents. Congress needs to realise that they are playing with fire by adopting this brand of dangerous politics. This can be threat to our national security, will result in dividing the communities even wider & will only help to radicalise one community against other!!
  7. Kronus

    Kronus Lieutenant SENIOR MEMBER

    Apr 20, 2011
    Likes Received:
    It is hard to believe anything UPA is doing nowadays. I don't know how to react on this. On one hand Mr. Madani is enjoying SPA treatment and on the other hand Mr. Purohit and his Family has gone through hell even though both are serious cases. :unsure:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page