Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Pak nukes now became an embarrassment and a problem

Discussion in 'South Asia & SAARC' started by DrSomnath999, Jul 15, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DrSomnath999

    DrSomnath999 Major RESEARCHER

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,664
    Likes Received:
    1,514
    Country Flag:
    France
    Abbotabad Raid : The Decision
    Nearly 3 years ago, in July 2008 the author came across a book that dealt with the likely locating of Osama Bin Laden (OBL for short) in a Pakistani city. The book predicted a heliborne assault. But even more interestingly, the book raised the crucial question on future of Pakistani nukes and the likelihood of these falling into the hands of the terrorists. Below is the fictional account of the American discussions that must have taken place before the raid on Abbotabad. The chapter has been reproduced below with the permission of the author.

    The Pak Nuclear Scenario
    A few weeks before Operation to nab Osama Bin laden was launched, its likely impact had been discussed threadbare in the US. At the NSC meeting that finalized Operation Falcon, much time was spent in discussing the aftermath of the capture of OBL. It was expected and accepted that there would be a general mayhem on the Muslim street. American citizens and businesses would be the first targets. But unfortunately as the President mentioned, the need for secrecy precluded any advance warning to hapless civilians. It was agreed, with a nod from State Department, that a private warning without any mention of a time frame would be given to all Americans. In any case, in the most volatile countries, there were very few Americans.
    The Secretary of State then gave her assessment of the politics in Pakistan and the threat it posed to the US. “Besides the street violence that we must expect, the second aspect of the backlash was what would happen in Pakistan and to its nukes,â€￾ she said.

    “Pakistan’s nuclear complex poses two main threats. The first, that nuclear weapons, know-how, or materials will find their way into the hands of terrorists. For instance, we have learned that in August of 2001, even as the final planning for 9/11 was under way, Osama bin Laden received two former officials of Pakistan’s atomic-energy program—Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood and Abdul Majid—at a secret compound near Kabul. Over the course of three days of intense Jihad: From Hindukush to Armageddon 52 conversation, bin Laden and his second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, grilled Mahmood and Majid about how to make weapons of mass destruction."

    "After Mahmood and Majid were arrested, on October 23, 2001, Mahmood told Pakistani interrogation teams, working in concert with the CIA, that Osama bin Laden had expressed a keen interest in nuclear weapons and had sought the scientists’ help in recruiting other Pakistani nuclear experts who could provide expertise in the mechanics of bomb-making. CIA Director George Tenet found the report of Mahmood and Majid’s meeting with bin Laden so disturbing that he flew directly to Islamabad to confront Pakistan’s President,â€￾ the Secretary of State said. She went on, “Clearly, there is a significant danger that the black market will put Pakistani nukes, or nuclear material and technical knowledge, in terrorist hands—if it hasn’t already. But there is a second, equally significant danger: that a coup might topple the President and leave all or some of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons under the control of al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or some other militant Islamic group or, indeed, under the control of more than one."

    " Part of the problem is that in order to keep its focal enemy, India, from destroying its arsenal in a pre-emptive strike, Pakistan has hidden its nuclear weapons throughout the country; some of them may be in regions that are effectively under fundamentalist Muslim control. Moreover, Pakistan’s official alliance with the United States in the war on terror has only increased the danger posed by al-Qaeda sympathizers within its nuclear establishment. Although Pakistan has pledged unstinting cooperation in the fight against terrorism, not all the thousands of officers in Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies have signed on."

    "After all, until 9/11 some of them were working closely with members of al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Nor, for that matter, does Pakistan’s general population support the alliance with the United States. The uneasy contradiction between pro-American foreign policy and the widespread anti-Americanism within Pakistan has forced Pakistani policymakers to walk a razor’s edge.â€￾

    The Secretary paused to take a breath. No one said a word, and she continued, “Under these conditions the emergence of a nuclear-equipped splinter group from within the Pakistani establishment looks disturbingly plausible. Provoked by anger due to the feeling that President has made Pakistan a puppet of the United States, such a group would have not only a motive and the domestic political support for a nuclear terrorist act against America but also the organizational competence, the expertise, and the raw material to carry it out. What to do about this combustible mixture of extreme political instability and nuclear capability is perhaps the most difficult challenge facing U.S. today,â€￾ she said. As the Secretary of State finished, there was a silence as members of the NSC absorbed the finer points of his presentation. It would seem that the capture/killing of OBL would enhance the threat of a terrorist nuclear attack on the US.

    The President readily accepted the assessment but posed a counter question, “Will keeping OBL free and at large to carry on his activities, diminish that threat? No, at some point in time OBL may launch not just an isolated terrorist attack but even may accumulate several nukes to launch a concerted attack using ‘unconventional’ means of delivery.â€￾ Reluctantly, he motioned to the National Security Advisor to give a brief outline of the US South Asia Nuclear Strategy.

    The NSA, a man of few words and seldom spoke at most meetings of the NSC. But it was due to the fact that under the President’s strict instructions, certain aspects of US strategy were not discussed even at the NSC. The complicated American game plan in South Asia was one of them. But he understood the rationale behind the President’s decision to make an exception this time. No one understood it more, with his vast experience of inter services wrangles that in order for an operation to succeed all the participating agencies had to come on board willingly. Operation against OBL was complicated in the sense of the involvement of many agencies and was far too important to risk failure.

    The NSA began slowly in measured tones, almost as if giving a lecture to National Defence University. Outlining the history of the area he began by tracing the events of the late 20th century.

    “You all are familiar with the Indo-Pak blood feud. India always had an ambition to play the role of regional if not a global super power. In the early 1960s it acquired most of the wherewithal for Plutonium based nuclear weapons, partly through our help since we wanted them as counter to the Chinese. It was also in part through own efforts. In 1974 India went overt with its capability. By then our relations with China had improved to the point that we were in a quasi-alliance with it against the Soviet Union. At that time India was more or less firmly in the Soviet Camp, at NATO exercises we used to count Indian forces as part of the enemy strength. It made sense to us and Chinese, to counter this capability by building a Pakistani counter. We did it indirectly through the Europeans, particularly the Germans. In fact, when the Dutch were bent upon prosecuting that rouge AQ Khan, we prevented them from doing so. We were careful that while we let Pakistan develop Uranium 235 based nukes, we stalled their attempts to get there through the Plutonium route. The idea was that the bulky nukes that Pakistan would thus have will be aircraft dependent for delivery, the F-16s supplied by us. Since we controlled the spares for F-16, we controlled the delivery system that could reach India but not anywhere else, especially Israel.'

    “Things began to get out of control in the 1980s when Pakistan went behind our back to the North Koreans and obtained their missiles. But even then the lack of miniaturization meant that it was still an aircraft-based delivery, and under our control.

    “In 1992 the Soviet Union dissolved and a whole new world situation emerged. There is not a single think tank anywhere in world that had predicted this; neither did our thousands of Soviet experts. Soon China began to emerge as the potential threat, we zeroed in on India as a possible counter. Pakistan’s nukes now became an embarrassment and a problem. But even now its anti-Indian orientation meant that it was at worst a regional threat. Despite the talk of an ‘Islamic Bomb,’ we were certain that the Pak’s had limited ambitions related to India and India alone. Pan Islamism was a mere slogan for the pragmatic Punjabis, the real rulers of Pak. After all, under the most Islamist of Pak rulers General Zia Ul haq, the Pak army had no qualms in killing Palestinians with gusto in the September 1970 crackdown in Jordan.

    “Things took a turn for the worse with rise of Al Qaeda in the early90s. The nuclear ‘Wal-Mart’ that AQ Khan created has already been spelt out by the Secretary of State. The 9/11 attack on the US confirmed our worst fears. In the aftermath of that attack we leaned on Pakistan to shut its proliferation efforts. In return we promised to let them keep 10 nukes to target the Indian cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Calcutta, Ahmadabad, and Poona, with a 100 % spare. These are mated with missiles and in fixed silos. We ensured that the targeting system is inflexible. As a quid pro quo, Pakistan agreed to scale down its enrichment for the rest of the Uranium to below weapons grade. Thus, as a bargain we have virtually shut this route of fissile material to the terrorists,â€￾ he explained.

    Pausing for breath, he resumed, “All the Corps commanders, the real decision makers in Pakistan, are one with the President on this. This is a well known ‘secret’ in the ruling circles of Pakistan. When the President talks of his ideology of ‘Pakistan First’ he refers to the nukes as well. Even if the Islamists take over the country, no Pak General, howsoever Pan Islamist, will denude the Pak threat to India! When General Aslam Beg and Hamid Gul talked about nuking India, irrespective from where and by whom it was attacked, both were stating the obvious fact. Pak nukes are uni-directional, aimed at India.

    “The Indians have long suspected this and thus were the first to join us on the missile defense shield project. Unknown to the Pakistanis, we have given the Indians the latest Patriot and Sparrow anti- missile shield. In turn, the Indians have accepted our proposal that since Pak is afraid of a pre-emptive Indian attack, India would keep its missiles and nuclear weapons separate, sort of ‘H minus 6’ deterrence. The Indians have carried out drills to ready their retaliatory nuclear weapons in six hours time after warning. In return for the shield we supplied, the Indians have accepted this compromise. This separation is known to the Pakistanis and we have thus allayed their fears of Indian pre-emption. All in all, a win all strategy,â€￾ he said.

    There was a murmur of approval at this sharp Yankee business acumen. We create the threat and then offer the counter, of course, at a price.

    “Given the fact that fissile material is not available from Pakistani sources and their nukes are neutralized, in a sense; I do not foresee a terrorist nuclear attack in the aftermath of Operation to kill OBL.â€￾

    The presentation by the NSA clinched the argument and NSC overwhelmingly approved the launching of Operation to nab OBL. The rest, as they say, is history.â€￾

    Courtesy: Sunita Johsi from the her book JIHAD: FROM HINDUKUSH TO ARMAGEDDON.
     
  2. A haseeb A

    A haseeb A Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,547
    Likes Received:
    309
    But they became an embarresment for the Americans...I salute our minds that we ditched them and kept up with our own strategy...

    A few clarifications:

    1. PAF F-16s have the full capability of delivering nukes...what is needed is software and a cable for the arming system (Of course it isn't that simple,but thats all I know)...Pakistan has already modified Mk-82/84 bombs for this purpose.

    2. The NSA guy is either a goof or the author has added something of her own...but Pakistan has already made Plutonium based nukes,which is evident from the miniaturization of our nukes in systems like Nasr...Nukes neutralized? And Pakistan has only 20 of them?....lol,this guy is making me laugh hard...
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. Spartacus+

    Spartacus+ Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    175
    No need to waste time author is sunita joshi
     
  4. shivendrashukla

    shivendrashukla 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    6
    That, in my opinion, is not a valid argument.

    Moreover, it is just a work of fiction.
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page