Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Radicalization in the Name of Religion by Islamic Fascists.

Discussion in 'International Politics' started by layman, Oct 15, 2013.

  1. omya

    omya Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,557
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Country Flag:
    India
  2. omya

    omya Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,557
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Country Flag:
    India
    Sharia UK: Two women in court for tearing up Qur’an at soccer match

    [​IMG]
    Two women have gone on trial after denying committing religiously aggravated harassment by tearing up a copy of the Koran during a Birmingham City match at St Andrew’s.

    Middlesbrough FC fans Julie Phillips, 50, and Gemma Parkin, 18, both say they ripped pages from a book but denied knowing it was the Koran last December.

    The pair were at St Andrew’s where Blues drew 2 – 2 with Boro.

    The court was told that it was during the second half of the match that stewards saw a book being handed around the away fans and being ripped up.

    After enquiries it emerged the book was the Koran.

    Parkin, of Kimberley Drive, Middlesbrough, and Phillips, of Kenmore Road, Middlesbrough, were among Boro fans pointed out to police.

    They are appearing at Birmingham Magistrates’ Court today (May 1) each facing a charge of religiously aggravated harassment, which they deny.

    Giving evidence, match steward Matthew Corns told the court he heard chants about Muslims and the Koran as the book was passed around and torn up on December 7.
     
  3. omya

    omya Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,557
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Country Flag:
    India
    Arresting Churchill

    [​IMG]
    Paul Weston, the chairman of a new political party in the United Kingdom called Liberty GB, was making a speech Saturday outside the Winchester Guildhall in Hampshire when suddenly everything went wrong. Weston made the mistake of quoting a notorious Islamophobe, whereupon a woman in the audience, disgusted by this hate speech, contacted police, and Weston was duly arrested.

    The Islamophobe in question was an obscure British politician of the distant past named Winston Churchill, who apparently had something to do with leading the British to victory over something called Nazi Germany in a conflict apparently known as “World War II.” However, the Nazis were vociferous critics of Zionism, and thus couldn’t have been all bad.

    Even before he interfered with this righteous anti-Zionist activism, Churchill was an obvious hatemonger. In 1899 he wrote a book about an even more obscure war known as The River War, in which he spewed this Islamophobic hate:

    How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith.

    It is stunning that such a racist, bigoted Islamophobe could ever have risen to prominence in a gloriously multicultural land such as Britain, but Churchill apparently rose to prominence at a time when racists and bigots roamed free and unchallenged, before Britain discovered the glories of diversity. Now hatemongers like Weston – who quoted this exact passage – get their comeuppance swiftly. Churchill, were he walking around free today, if he didn’t already have enough citations for puffing away on smelly and carcinogenic cigars in public places to put him away for life, would certainly be cited for his Islamophobia, and his public career would be ruined.

    For now we live in different times. Now we know that diversity is our strength, and therefore we applaud the recent decision of the Subway fast food restaurant chain. The Daily Mail reported on Wednesday that “around 200 branches of Subway have cut ham and bacon from their menus, serving halal meat in response to calls from their Muslim customers.”

    In the caption on a photo accompanying this article, the Daily Mail wrote: “Nearly 200 Subway branches across the UK and Ireland have cut out ham and bacon, selling only halal meat, in response to demand from their multicultural customers.” By their “multicultural customers,” of course, they mean only customers from Islamic cultures, but those are the only cultures that matter anymore in the United Kingdom. Some people may carp and complain, pointing out that this decision has rendered these 200 Subway restaurants lessmulticultural than they were before, since now non-Muslims in Britain who would like to enjoy a Chicken and Bacon Ranch Melt or an Italian sub with pepperoni are out of luck: Muslims and Sharia-compliant dhimmis are the only ones who will be served.

    But people who would raise such an objection are as hidebound and deeply racist as Weston and this Churchill fellow. It is diversity, you see, to offer the choices preferred by only one group. It is multiculturalism, you see, to respect the preferences of only one culture. It is hate, you see, to point out that The Belief System To Which Everyone Must Pander has been the cause of and justification for the oppression and misery of untold numbers of women, non-Muslims, and others. It is bigotry, you see, to point out that all too many adherents of that hallowed and protected Belief System hold to a violent and supremacist ideology that they believe gives them a responsibility before God to wage war against and subjugate those who hold different beliefs.

    And so it is good that Paul Weston was arrested for quoting that hateful Churchill chap. I’ve just checked Wikipedia and discovered that Churchill succeeded one Neville Chamberlain as Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1940, after Chamberlain had tried to keep the peace with those lovely anti-Zionist Nazis by giving them Czechoslovakia, which Chamberlain aptly dismissed as “a far-away country” filled with “people of whom we know nothing.” Chamberlain should have remained in power, and Churchill subjected to the ridicule and abuse that all hatemongering Islamophobes should receive regularly. After all, who really did care about Czechoslovakia? And who cares today about Subway restaurants? As long as we stop the hate, all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well. As long as we give Islamic supremacists what they want, they will see our good will, and not demand anything more.

    After all, wasn’t everything just fine after Chamberlain gave his Czech gift to the Nazis? At least until that Churchill came along.

    Source
     
  4. omya

    omya Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,557
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Country Flag:
    India
    Jihadists in Syria force force female students to wear burkas or face floggings

    [​IMG]
    Female students who attend school in al-Raqa have been forced to wear Islamic dress or face floggings, resident Mohammed al-Hallaq told Al-Shorfa. [Waleed Abu al-Khair/Al-Shorfa]

    Other al-Raqa residents told Al-Shorfa they are barely able to provide daily bread for their families and that ISIL elements are imposing a strict Islamic lifestyle on residents which impacts all aspects of life, including education.

    Obama say, “respect it.”

    To quote Pope Benedict, who was quoting the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus, “an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam, and the truth of both In the seventh conversation (διάλεξις - controversy), addresses his interlocutor saying: ‘Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.’”

    With these words, Mohammed al-Hallaq described the way he feels living under the rule of al-Qaeda-inspired ISIL in al-Raqa.

    Source
     
  5. omya

    omya Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,557
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Country Flag:
    India
  6. omya

    omya Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,557
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Country Flag:
    India
    ‘Sex Jihad’ Fatwa Permits Incest in Syria

    [​IMG]
    ‘Sex Jihad’ Fatwa Permits Incest in Syria,” Raymond Ibrahim, May 2, 2013

    Last year, according to Arabic media accounts, “Saudi cleric Nasser al-‘Umar issued a fatwa permitting mujahidin [jihadis] in Syria to have sex-jihad with their sisters [muharamhum] if no one else is available. The Saudi preacher also praised the mujahidin for their ongoing fight against, in his words, the machine of infidelity and oppression, that is, the Syrian and Iranian regimes.”

    The cleric issued his fatwa on “one of the channels associated with the radical jihadi movements” where he also reportedly said: “Some today are opposing the fatwas being issued by the clerics which serve our mujahidin brethren fighting in Syria [a likely reference to Muslim criticism—as opposed to Western denial—of the sex-jihadfatwas], without criticizing the killing of children and women in Syria.”
    As shocking as this report may seem, it is not the first of its kind. For example, according to this Arabic documentary video (click “cc” for English subtitles), “The new jihad allows brothers and sisters in Syria belonging to the [al-Qaeda linked] al-Nusra Front to marry each other under the name of jihad because of the lack of girls among fighters of that organization.”

    One man appears on video saying, “At the Zawia mountain there is an imam called Imam Hussein. They bring him a brother and a sister, he says ‘Allahu Akbar’ on them three times to have sex together and make them husband and wife.”
    The rationale and justification of these fatwas is based on the Islamic maxim, “necessity makes the prohibited permissible,” not unlike the more familiar adage, “the ends justify the means.”

    In other words, because fighting to make the “word of Allah,” or Sharia, supreme is the greatest good, and because sexually-deprived jihadis fighting to do just that may lose morale and quit the theatre of war for lack of women, it is permissible, indeed laudable, for Muslim women—including apparently relatives—to volunteer to give up their bodies to these men so that they can continue the jihad to empower Islam, in accordance with the Koran: “Allah has purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain” (Yusuf Ali trans. 9:111).

    This verse has been traditionally understood as Muslim men selling “their persons,” that is, their bodies, to the jihad in exchange for paradise. In the context of sex jihad, however, Muslim women—including sisters—are also selling “their persons” (their bodies for sex) to indirectly empower the jihad, also in exchange for paradise.

    The fact is, the maxim, “necessity makes the prohibited permissible,” is responsible for any number of seeming contradictions: Muslim women must chastely be covered head-to-toe—yet, in the service of jihad, they are allowed to prostitute their bodies. Homosexuality is forbidden—but permissibleif rationalized as a way to kill infidels. Lying is forbidden—but permissible to empower Islam. Suicide is forbidden—but permissible during the jihad—called “martyrdom.” Stealing is forbidden—but the rightful booty of the jihadi who conquers infidels.
    The moral of the story? Sharia is only draconian and rigid for those who find themselves living under its jurisprudence. But as for those who work to empower Allah’s law—chief among them, the jihadis—not only are they permitted to ignore Sharia, they are permitted to ignore basic standards of morality.

    Hence the ancient and widespread appeal of the jihad.



    - See more at: ‘Sex Jihad’ Fatwa Permits Incest in Syria | Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs
     
  7. omya

    omya Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2013
    Messages:
    7,557
    Likes Received:
    3,828
    Country Flag:
    India
  8. forjeet

    forjeet Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    303
    Marco Polo gave a good comparison between the militant and the moderate Muslim....!!

    [​IMG]
     
    omya likes this.
  9. forjeet

    forjeet Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    303
    [​IMG]
     
    omya likes this.
  10. Anees

    Anees Lt. Colonel ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2012
    Messages:
    5,694
    Likes Received:
    3,268
    Country Flag:
    United States
    Muslim Incest: Imam and Syrian Terror Commander caught on video having sex with his granddaughter

    [​IMG]

    Grandpa and morality commander for the future Caliphate killing people in Syria, Sheikh Al Nasouh, has a go with his own granddaughter until he gets caught and scrambles to put his pants on. How about that. Grandpa is mounting her like the molesting of his donkeys. Following the footsteps of the pedo-prophet of Islam.

    Had it been someone else he would have ordered their execution to comply with Allah’s laws. But when it is himself, he suddenly feels remorseful and wants to be pardoned. This is how Muslims are all the time. Complete hypocrites. And they can never let other people lead their own lives without always trying to control them.

    A video of a bearded man allegedly raping his own grand daughter has went viral on YouTube, recording more than 150 thousand hits in a few hours. The video claims that the man is Sheikh Mohamad Kassem Al Nasouh, an Imam in Deir El Zour, Syria, and a leader of the Ahbab Al Sahaba Islamist brigade. Arabic News websites have widely reported on the video, while the Egypt Today website quoted activists saying that the man is indeed an Imam.

    The video shows the man from a distance with the grand daughter, who seemed to be begging her allegedly maternal grandfather to stop. Seconds later, the man shooting the video surprises the grandfather, shouting “you are having sex with your grand daughter”, and then starts an interrogation, leading to the man’s confession. The grandfather claims that this is the first time this has happened. [hm...yeah right. We believe you. Not.]

    The victim granddaughter, Yosra Mohamed Rashid, was roughed by the men, and heard begging them to leave her. She confessed that he was getting “pleasure” from her; the men showed no mercy or sympathy to her case. No sympathy for incest victims.



     
    omya likes this.
  11. forjeet

    forjeet Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    303
    Islam Creates Monsters Says Psychologist

    [​IMG]

    Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels, an expert in working with Muslim youth criminal offenders, has written a new book entitled Among Criminal Muslims. A Psychologist’s Experience from the Copenhagen Municipality, and in an essay supporting the book, he claims that “Islam creates monsters.” A recent study out of Germany supports Sennels’ statement. It found that devout Muslims were more prone to violence than the non-Muslim participants in the study.

    Sennels says Islam is different from other religions because the way it is taught brainwashes its youth with violent messages. Parents inflict violence on their children repeatedly, Sennels claims, and at the same time, deliver religious ideology. He says this behavior makes Muslim extremists far more violent than extremists of other religious faiths.

    The brainwashing, as Sennels terms it, begins very early on in a child’s life, and religious messages are repeated vigorously along with a heavy dose of physical discipline. It is this combination of pain and reinforcement, Sennels claims, that creates Islamic “monsters” who then feel justified in torturing and killing innocent people.

    Sennels points out that parents want to indoctrinate their children into the religion as early as possible so that the kids will remain Muslim instead of looking to another faith—under Sharia law, turning against Islam is a crime punishable by death.

    He goes on to point out that Muslim culture lags far behind in the “understanding of human development,” and therefore, the techniques that Westerners would call child abuse are deeply ingrained and normalized among Muslim parents as correct child-rearing strategies.

    Sennels says that in Muslim culture, the idea of “constructive criticism” doesn’t exist, and any criticism of Muslim identity will result in extreme anger and quite possibly, physical violence. The Quran itself, Sennels claims, does not allow for the idea of tolerance, and calls for Muslims to separate from non-Muslims and view people of other faiths as inferior. This, in turn breeds hatred, Sennels claims. He explains:

    The cultural and psychological cocktail of anger, low self-esteem, victim mentality, a willingness to be blindly guided by outer authorities, and an aggressive and discriminatory view toward non-Muslims, forced upon Muslims through pain, intimidation and mind-numbing repetitions of the Quran, is the reason why Islam creates monsters.

    His remarks have stirred up a great deal of controversy, but a large study out of Germany, involving 45,000 teens, seems to support Sennels’ claims. In that study, a strong link between the level of religious Muslim belief and the willingness to participate in violence was revealed.

    Notably, the study’s author undertook the project hoping it would prove the opposite outcome. Christian Pfeiffer, a scientist who works at the Criminal Research Institute in Saxony, said that he has been active in opposing any campaign to denigrate Muslims or other foreigners, and he was disappointed by the study results.

    Studies and the opinions of experts like psychologists that show a correlation between Islam and violence are widely criticized by supporters of Islam, and are often described as “Islamaphobia” no matter how scientific the claim.

    Supporters of Islam say that it is a religion of peace, and that it is no more likely than other religions to cause violent behavior. In a paper out of the University of Notre Dame, author Rashied Omar says that Islam is not meant to be a pacifist religion and simplistic definitions of the faith are reductive. Despite the fact that Islam is not meant to be a pacifist tradition, Omar says, “the history of Islam has certainly not been witness to any more violence than one finds in other traditions.”

    Psychologist Nicolai Sennels says Islam creates monsters; a statement that has strengthened the raging debate about the link between Islam and violence. It is a debate which shows no signs of slowing down soon, and one that many feel requires additional scientific study

    Islam Creates Monsters Says Psychologist
    Excellent Work by Psychologist Nicolai Sennels :mrgreen:
     
  12. forjeet

    forjeet Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    303
    Muslim Inbreeding: Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society

    Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1.400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool. The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring’s intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings

    The most famous example of inbreeding is in ancient Egypt, where several Pharaonic dynasties collapsed after a couple of hundred years. In order to keep wealth and power within the family, the Pharaohs often married their own sister or half-sister and after a handful of generations the offspring were mentally and physically unfit to rule. Another historical example is the royal houses of Europe where royal families often married among each other because tradition did not allow them to marry people of non-royal class.

    The high amount of mentally retarded and handicapped royalties throughout European history shows the unhealthy consequences of this practice. Luckily, the royal families have now allowed themselves to marry for love and not just for status.

    The Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for longer than any Egyptian dynasty. This practice also predates the world’s oldest monarchy (the Danish) by 300 years.

    A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins :LMAO:(so-called "consanguinity") and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants"

    Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguine (blood related), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen (Reproductive Health Journal, 2009 Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.).

    A large part of inbred Muslims are born from parents who are themselves inbred - which increase the risks of negative mental and physical consequenses greatly.

    The amount of blood related marriages is lower among Muslim immigrants living in the West. Among Pakistanis living in Denmark the amount is down to 40 percent and 15 percent among Turkish immigrants (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants".).


    More than half of Pakistani immigrants living in Britain are intermarried:


    Low intelligence

    Several studies show that children of consanguineous marriages have lower intelligence than children of non-related parents. Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from related parents and that abilities related to social behavior develops slower in inbred babies:

    "Effects of parental consanguinity on the cognitive and social behavior of children have been studied among the Ansari Muslims of Bhalgapur, Bihar.

    IQ in inbred children (8-12 years old) is found to be lower (69 in rural and 79 in suburban populations) than that of the outbred ones (79 and 95 respectively). The onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies." (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children").

    Mental and physical diseases and death

    The risk of stillbirth doubles when parents are first cousins (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants). One study analyzed the risk of perinatal death (the child dies during its own birth), infant death (child dies while still infant) and autosomal recessive disorders (serious and often deadly genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy):

    Perinatal mortality in the Pakistani children was 1.5 times higher than that in the Norwegian children, and infant mortality in the Pakistani children was more than double that in the Norwegian children. Deaths due to autosomal recessive disorders were 18 times more common in the Pakistani children. Similarly, deaths due to multiple malformations, which may be part of unrecognized autosomal recessive syndromes, were 10 times more common.
    (BMJ, 1994 Infant death and consanguineous marriage.

    There are also evidence suggesting that inbred people has a higher risk of developing mental disorders: "The clinical observations indicated that depression is very high in some communities where the consanguinity of marriages is also high." (Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2009 "Relationship between consanguinity and depression in a south Indian population".

    Another study focused on the relationship between intermarriage and schizophrenia: "The closer the blood relative, the more likely was there to be a schizophrenic illness."
    The increased risk of insanity among children of marriages between cousins might explain why immigrant patients are stressing the psychiatric system and are strongly overrepresented among insane criminals:

    Implications for the Western and the Muslim World


    The consequences for offspring of consanguineous marriages are unpleasantly clear: Death, low intelligence or even mental retardation, handicaps and diseases often leading to a slow and painful death. Other consequences are:

    The cognitive consequences of Muslim inbreeding might explain why non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the Danish army's intelligence test than native Danes: "19.3% of non-Western immigrants are not able to pass the Danish army's intelligence test. In comparison, only 4.7% of applicants with Danish background do not pass." (TV 2 Nyhederne, 13/6 2007 Immigrants flunk army test.

    It probably also explains - at least partly - why two thirds of all immigrant school children with Arabic backgrounds are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system: "Those who speak Arabic with their parents have an extreme tendency to lack reading abilities - 64 percent are illiterate. ... No matter if it concerns reading abilities, mathematics or science, the pattern is the same: The bilingual (largely Muslim) immigrants' skills are exceedingly poor compared to their Danish classmates." (Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, May 2007: Ethnic students does not make Danish children worse.


    The lack of interest in science and human development in the Muslim World is also clear in the UN Arab Human Development Reports (AHDR). AHDR concludes that there have been fewer books translated into Arabic in the last thousand years than the amount of books translated within the country of Spain every year:

    "The Arab world translates about 330 books annually, one fifth of the number that Greece translates. The cumulative total of translated books since the Caliph Maa'moun's [sic] time (the ninth century) is about 100,000, almost the average that Spain translates in one year." (Eugene Rogan ”Arab Books and human development”. Index of Censorship, vol. 33, issue 2 April 2004, p. 152-157). "70 percent of the Turkish citizens never read books."(APA, 23 February 2009 “).


    Conclusion


    There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. The overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences have been explained above.


    A legislative ban on first cousin marriages is a logical and compassionate imperative for both the Muslim world, for EU and our Western national governments.

    • Muslim Inbreeding: Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society | EuropeNews :rofl::rofl:
     
  13. forjeet

    forjeet Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    303
  14. forjeet

    forjeet Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    303
    [​IMG]
    Perceived insults against Islam can cause much public anger in Pakistan

    The numbers of deaths and ruined lives caused by Pakistan’s blasphemy law continues to rise. But the global “human rights community” remains indifferent. The Pakistani blasphemy law is, after all, derived from Islamic law. To oppose or denounce it would be “Islamophobic.” “Pakistan ‘blasphemy lawyer’ shot dead in Multan office,”

    BBC News - Pakistan 'blasphemy lawyer' shot dead in Multan office
     
  15. forjeet

    forjeet Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2013
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    303
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    This is islam
     

Share This Page