Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Shortage of anti-landmine vehicles poses huge challenge for security forces

Discussion in 'Indian Defence Industry' started by layman, Apr 12, 2017.

  1. layman

    layman Aurignacian STAR MEMBER

    May 1, 2012
    Likes Received:
    Country Flag:
    United States

    Death of twelve CRPF personnel in an ambush in Chattisgarh last month has raised questions on the lack of use of Mine Protected Vehicles (MPVs) in life threatening terrains.According to Ministry of Home Affair’s report security forces operate in dangerous zones of Jammu and Kashmir, Left wing Extremist areas and north-east with hardly less than half of the approved strength of these vehicles.

    Naxals often use IEDs to counter the might of paramilitary forces. In 2016, 31 security personnel lost their lives, in comparison to 13 personnel in 2017 so far. Terrorist in Kashmir have also used ambush on security forces.

    The MPV’s have proven to lessen the impact of a mine or an IED, but data suggests that men in uniform often put their lives at risk without these vehicles.

    As per the modernisation plan, CRPF has sanctioned 668 MPVs, BSF 224 MPVs, Assam Rifles 92 MPVs and ITBP 40 MPVs but in reality only 126 MPVs, 24 MPVs, 28 MPVs and 20 MPVs respectively have been provided.

    The vehicles are sourced from Vehicle Factory Jabalpur (Ordinance factory board), but even the demand and supply has a huge deficit. According to MHA the sanctioned strength which includes latest procurement demand, 40 MPV are procured for CRPF, 12 each for BSF and ITBP and 7 for SSB.

    According to NSG National Bomb Data Centre, a total of 406 blast incidents with maximum 337 Improvised Explosive Devices and 69 explosive ordinance have taken place in India in 2016 killing 112 and leaving 479 injured.

    The Lockean likes this.
  2. The Lockean

    The Lockean 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Mar 12, 2017
    Likes Received:
    Country Flag:
    What the writer has failed to highlight at the same time, is that the terrain, as also the topography, preclude use of these vehicles in routine operations.

    An example of J&K can be given. In routine CI/CT operations in valley proper, the MPVs are being used extensively both by Army and the CAPFs. Since the area is urban and flatland, these vehicles are easy to use and face no difficulty in operations.

    However, in the LC regions, the area is mountainous, undulating and the "excellent" non-existential roads with steep gradients, make it impossible for these vehicles to move 'out' of valley proper and into LC regions like Keran, Machchil, Gruez. They simply do not have the power, and in one rainfall/snow, get bogged down.

    Now in North East and Chattisgarh - how do you deploy MPVs inside a jungle? Where the trails have to be taken? Does the wuthor propose cutting down the whole jungles?
    Guynextdoor and layman like this.

Share This Page