Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

Strategic Weapons in Wrong Hands

Discussion in 'Europe & Russia' started by BlackOpsIndia, Nov 25, 2016.

  1. BlackOpsIndia

    BlackOpsIndia Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2016
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    1,400
    Country Flag:
    India
    Link: http://moderndiplomacy.eu/index.php...9:strategic-weapons-in-wrong-hands&Itemid=156

    During the Indian Premier Narendra Modi’s last trip to Moscow, there was no progress made on the sale of missile defense system S-400 and Akula class nuclear submarines. Although two leaders were agreed on jointly producing Kamov-226 military helicopters and building nuclear power plants.

    Indian defence ministry on the behalf of Indian Air Force showed interest in Russian S-400 Triumf air defense system. However the Moscow clarified it will never reciprocate to such request until India negotiates the joint Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) development program. So it was explicable when there was no follow-up negotiated on S-400 sale during Modi’s visit. But at the sidelines of the eight BRICS summit, India and Russia agreed to sign an inter-governmental agreement for the procurement of four regiments of Russian-made S-400 Triumf.

    The S-400 Triumf (NATO designation: SA-21 Growler) is a new-generation medium and long-range anti-aircraft missile system. This missile system was manufactured by the Almaz-Antey Corporation and contains multiple missile variants to counter stealth aircraft, UAVs, cruise missiles and sub-strategic ballistic missiles. It can strike planes and tactical ballistic targets at a distance of 250 miles (400 km). The Indian Air Force desires the S-400 to enhance its air defense systems. Meanwhile, the purchase of S-400 is a sign that India is far away in creating an indigenous operative anti-missile missile system.

    Recently, Vladimir Drozhzhov, deputy head of Russia’s Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC) claimed that, “The Russian Federal Service has prepared a draft intergovernmental agreement on the supply of the S-400 systems to India and passed it on to our partners, so we are awaiting a response.” Whereas, Aide to the President of Russia and head of the Control Directorate of the Presidential Administration of Russia, Vladimir Kozhin said that “There are many of those who want it (the S-400 system) but the case is that we are not able to supply everyone with it and therefore we will not deliver it to everyone because the priority is the Russian army, however, the negotiations with China and India are underway,”

    Russia has been using the S-400 Triumf system for countering strategic threats with respect to its requirements obligatory in context of Europe against the United States. Now in future, the probable existence of these missiles in the South Asia, especially under Indian command is certainly going to contribute as another problem for Pakistani military. The future proliferation of S-400 to India is a grave challenge for Pakistan and it rings alarm bells also for China. The Triumf air defense system is easy to transport, well networked and has a range to defend huge areas. The traditional non-stealth fighter jets are specific target for the system and completely useless in the region where this system is being installed.

    Some analysts contemplated that the best counter to the Triumf system is a long-range Surface to Air missile (SAM), for instance the Chinese HQ-9. Whereas, the genuine measure against Triumf system is to obtain a comprehensive ability which would preferably destroy India’s air defence capabilities. There are numerous methods available to counter an air defence system i.e. Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD), Directed Energy Air Defense (DEAD), radar decoys, stealth air strike, drone air strike, cruise missile and ground invasion. Theoretically the conventional answer for Pakistan Airforce is to attain stealth aircraft along with anti-radiation air-to-surface missiles and sub-munition capable air launched cruise missiles (ALCM). Whereas Pakistan Army should invest in multiple independently-guided re-entry vehicle (MIRV) equipped ballistic missiles to counter any future acquisition of S-400 by India.

    Sputnik reported last year that Beijing had already concluded $3-billion worth deal to purchase the S-400 Triumf from Moscow and it will receive the first batch as early as 2016. Therefore it is quite possible that China will be first beneficiary of S-400. In such scenario China will definitely not on the same page with Russia to supply such important strategic weapons to India. Whereas Russia can no longer ignore China’s likes and dislikes in contemporary picture. The reason for such closeness between Moscow and Beijing is pragmatic sanctions on Russia by the West and China’s unconditional support to Russia in this critical passage of time.

    Meanwhile, the U.S. is quite concerned with Russian S-400 air defense systems going global. The U.S. is sensitive on the issue of deploying this system in any region especially in South Asia because this will put restrictions on the U.S. manoeuvrability in the region, as one senior U.S. Marine Corps said that, “(S-400) a complete game changer for all fourth-gen aircraft (like the F-15, F-16 and F/A-18). That thing is a beast and you don’t want to get near it.”

    On the other hand the U.S. is building case to mainstreaming India into the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). Therefore, India has to align itself according to MTCR guidelines but by the purchase of S-400 system it is violating the MTCR Guidelines and risking the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

    The S-400 Triumf system under India’s command will contest Pakistan’s capability to conduct Air defense or Air offense operations in its airspace. It will also augment India’s ability to counter Pakistan’s aerial preeminence. Pakistan will be forced to invest in technologies to counter or develop comparable systems to highlight weaknesses in India’s air defenses to uphold regional balance.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    @PARIKRAMA @Gessler beside the propaganda from pakistani author and self-conflicting unimpressive twisting can you please clarify on this:
    and

    The article is factually incorrect at a few places but this question of Russia linking it to PAK-FA was raised before BRICS too. There is no clear answer on sale, an intergovernmental agreement is signed but no commercial contract, which will follow in coming months. But I want to ask about this intergovernmental contract, is it like a MoU? Just formality and no binding? or is it binding and unless something drastic happens Russia will sell it to India?
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2016
  2. PARIKRAMA

    PARIKRAMA Captain IDF NewBie

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2016
    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    7,574
    Country Flag:
    India
    The author is correct.. S400 is in wrong hands.. ideally it should have been in Pakistan's hand as they have the only right for everything in this world.:facepalm:

    The news from the other side is going pretty low in standards.. now they went much below our MSM which I feel was already idiotic.:hitwall:
     
  3. Agent_47

    Agent_47 Admin - Blog IDF NewBie

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,958
    Likes Received:
    5,851
    Country Flag:
    India
    link please?
     
    R!CK likes this.
  4. A_poster

    A_poster Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,077
    Likes Received:
    1,591
    Country Flag:
    India

    Looks like author does not know that S-400 IS A SAM.
     
    BlackOpsIndia likes this.
  5. Darth Marr

    Darth Marr Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2016
    Messages:
    1,371
    Likes Received:
    2,310
    Country Flag:
    India
    Since when is S-400 a Strategic weapon ?
     
  6. BlackOpsIndia

    BlackOpsIndia Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2016
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    1,400
    Country Flag:
    India
    R!CK likes this.
  7. A_poster

    A_poster Captain FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2016
    Messages:
    1,077
    Likes Received:
    1,591
    Country Flag:
    India

    The author of this propaganda think that it is a surface to surface missile. Here:
    What has happened here is that the person who wrote this article did not knew about military technology much and did a cut paste job and put in some cliches like massa cheen's wunderwaffe destroying kuffar's S-400.

    More proof:
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2016
    Darth Marr likes this.
  8. BlackOpsIndia

    BlackOpsIndia Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2016
    Messages:
    737
    Likes Received:
    1,400
    Country Flag:
    India
    Some more:

    I wonder if He/She even know what MTCR is.
     
    A_poster likes this.
  9. venureddy

    venureddy Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    686
    Country Flag:
    India
    S-400 is a weapon of mass destruction???? well that just show stupid this writer is.
     
    BlackOpsIndia likes this.
  10. MilSpec

    MilSpec Mod Staff Member MODERATOR

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    1,760
    Country Flag:
    India
    With this caliber of writers emanating from the neighboring country, the future of the hamsaya mulk is quite grim.
     
    BlackOpsIndia likes this.

Share This Page