Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

U.S. Explores Pakistan Supply Route Alternatives

Discussion in 'Modern Warfare' started by SpArK, May 19, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SpArK

    SpArK SorCeroR Staff Member ADMINISTRATOR

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,159
    Likes Received:
    2,111
    U.S. Explores Pakistan Supply Route Alternatives


    A shutdown of the supply routes that run through Pakistan would pose problems for the U.S. military but would not halt Afghan operations, according to the Army's chief logistics officer.

    "We would overcome it," Army Lt. Gen. Mitchell Stevenson, deputy chief of staff for logistics, told the Senate Armed Services readiness subcommittee during a May 18 hearing. "It would not stop Afghanistan operations, but it would be a challenge."

    Several lawmakers have voiced concern about the U.S. relationship with Pakistan following the capture of Osama bin Laden. A key part of that relationship is Pakistan's permission for the U.S. to move supplies for Afghanistan through the country. If those supply routes were shut down for any reason, lawmakers wanted to know what would happen.

    The Army keeps 45 days worth of fuel on the ground in Afghanistan so that operations can withstand severe disruptions to its supply lines, Stevenson said.

    If the southern routes were shut down, the U.S. would increase its use of airdrops and flow more in from the north. However, that route takes much longer and is more expensive, Stevenson said.


    Smaller disruptions already frequently delay the delivery of supplies. For example, a sit-down strike in Karachi is keeping supply trucks from getting to the port, Stevenson said. He expects the strike to last a couple of days.

    Of the supplies it delivers by land, the U.S. brings in 60 percent to Afghanistan from the north through Central Asia and the Baltic states and 40 percent from the south through Pakistan. There, supplies arrive in the port of Karachi and travel over land by contractor-driven trucks.

    The goal is to increase supplies coming in from the north to 75 percent, Stevenson said. "We're not there yet."

    The U.S. relies on airlift for all of its "sensitive" and "high-tech" equipment, Stevenson said. This is due to restrictions placed on the U.S. by countries along the northern route, as well as frequent attacks on supply trucks.

    To keep supplies off the roads, the U.S. also relies on a large pool of "theater-provided" equipment. The challenge there is that the equipment requires major overhaul and refurbishment about every two years. The capability to do that in Afghanistan is now available, the three-star said.

    The Army is also experimenting with shipping more supplies to a nearby "friendly country" and then flying them into Afghanistan using C-17s. The Army is examining whether this route is cheaper in the long run because it avoids pilferage and other kinds of attacks, Stevenson said.


    The general did not name the country. However, Stars and Stripes reported last spring that Bahrain served as a staging area to ship MRAP all-terrain vehicles into Afghanistan. The new vehicles were transported by ship to Bahrain and then flown to theater.

    U.S. Explores Pakistan Supply Route Alternatives - Defense News
     
  2. desiman

    desiman Lieutenant ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    296
    US trying to move away from Pakistan ? hmm interesting
     
  3. xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx

    xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,113
    Likes Received:
    831
    USA should use the route which Soviets used for supply during soviet occupation of afghanistan...i.e Via Central Asia...
     
  4. JanjaWeed

    JanjaWeed Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,728
    Likes Received:
    865
    soviets had whole of central asia under it's occupation & had an open land route to get to afghanistan via central asia! US doesn't have that luxury!
     
  5. xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx

    xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,113
    Likes Received:
    831
    Well central asian Countries will be Ever ready to Help USA & NATO forces...as they dont have any ill will against them...
     
  6. KillBill

    KillBill 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    127
    Now,please dont post this in the "other" forum ;)

    So many people could get up from their bed in the morning thinking that USA can not survive without the help of Pakistan and they have the highest leverage against the lone superpower.

    Its bad to shatter so many dreams you know ;)
     
  7. xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx

    xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,113
    Likes Received:
    831
    Not a Bad Idea Thanx for Remainding...
     
  8. JanjaWeed

    JanjaWeed Captain SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    1,728
    Likes Received:
    865
    ofcourse Central asian countries would be happy to host USA. But which port US will use to get their stuff to central asia in the first place? You are not suggesting to airlift the supplies, are you??
     
  9. Sher Malang

    Sher Malang Lieutenant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    337
    The north route will be far more secure than the south one.
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx

    xXX-Nair:::Saab-XXx Major SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,113
    Likes Received:
    831
    May be some Russian Help will do...
     
  11. Skull and Bones

    Skull and Bones Doctor Death Staff Member MODERATOR

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    4,822
    Likes Received:
    2,174
    Country Flag:
    India
    [​IMG]
     
    1 person likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page