Dismiss Notice
Welcome to IDF- Indian Defence Forum , register for free to join this friendly community of defence enthusiastic from around the world. Make your opinion heard and appreciated.

US NSA Michael Flynn Resigns

Discussion in 'The Americas' started by Gessler, Feb 14, 2017.

  1. Gessler

    Gessler Mod Staff Member MODERATOR

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Messages:
    8,994
    Likes Received:
    6,980
    Country Flag:
    India
    [​IMG]

    Embattled White House national security adviser Michael Flynn resigned Monday night, two sources tell CNN.

    His departure came just after reports surfaced the Justice Department warned the Trump administration last month that Flynn misled administration officials regarding his communications with the Russian ambassador to the United States and was potentially vulnerable to blackmail by the Russians.

    "I inadvertently briefed the Vice President-elect and others with incomplete information regarding my phone calls with the Russian ambassador. I have sincerely apologized to the President and the Vice President, and they have accepted my apology," Flynn wrote according to a copy of his resignation letter obtained by CNN.

    "I am tendering my resignation, honored to have served our nation and the American people in such a distinguished way," he wrote. "I know with the strong leadership of President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Mike Pence and the superb team they are assembling, this team will go down in history as one of the greatest presidencies in US history."

    The move comes less than a month into the job, making him one of the shortest-serving senior presidential advisers in modern history. Gen. Keith Kellogg will be the interim national security adviser, multiple sources tell CNN. He most recently served as National Security Council chief of staff. A senior administration official said Kellogg, retired Gen. David Petraeus and former Vice Admiral Bob Harward are possible replacements for Flynn.

    [​IMG]
    David Petraeus

    The sudden exit marks the most public display yet of disarray at the highest levels of the new administration, which has faced repeated questions over a slew of controversies and reports of infighting among senior aides during its first three weeks.

    The shakeup now leaves Trump without one of his closest and longest-serving advisers. Flynn had counseled Trump on foreign policy and national security matters since early in the 2016 presidential race. Flynn was not able to definitively refute a Washington Post story late last week that his conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak included communication about the sanctions. It is illegal for unauthorized private citizens to negotiate with foreign governments on behalf of the US.

    The controversy intensified after the report put Vice President Mike Pence and several senior White House advisers in an uncomfortable position, as they had denied in TV interviews weeks earlier that Flynn discussed sanctions with the ambassador. Some administration officials said Flynn must have misled Pence and others.
    "The knives are out," a White House official told CNN on Friday, noting that "there's a lot of unhappiness about this."

    Many expressed concern at the idea that Flynn, a retired lieutenant general who headed the Defense Intelligence Agency, would discuss sanctions with a foreign official whose calls are regularly monitored by US intelligence and law enforcement agencies. A US official confirmed to CNN on Friday that Flynn and Kislyak did speak about sanctions, among other matters, during a December call.

    [​IMG]
    US Vice President Mike Pence

    But after the call was made public, Pence told CBS News on January 15 that Flynn did not talk with Kislyak about the sanctions, which the Obama administration recently levied due to Russia's alleged interference in the 2016 elections.

    "They did not discuss anything having to do with the United States' decision to expel diplomats or impose censure against Russia," Pence told CBS News. On Friday, an aide close to the national security adviser told CNN that Flynn could not rule out that he spoke about sanctions on the call. The White House official blamed much of the outcry against Flynn on a Washington culture always in search of a scalp, but people within Trump's orbit did little to defend Flynn during appearances on Sunday news shows.

    Stephen Miller, White House policy director, was asked directly about Flynn's future on a number of Sunday talk shows. Miller responded by saying he was not the appropriate official to ask. "I don't have any answers today," Miller said in response to questions about whether Flynn misled the vice president. "I don't have any information one way or another to add anything to the conversation."

    CNN's Jim Acosta, Kevin Liptak and Dan Merica contributed to this report.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/13/p...te-house-national-security-adviser/index.html
     
  2. Gessler

    Gessler Mod Staff Member MODERATOR

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Messages:
    8,994
    Likes Received:
    6,980
    Country Flag:
    India
    From our perspective, this is not a very good turn of events. Will have to see who takes his place but I have a feeling it might as well be Petraeus...who, when he was CIA director, is on record saying ISI have no concrete links with terror organizations.

    https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/16...omenting-trouble-in-Afghanistan-says-Petraeus

    However, he does appear to have a balanced view of India and our role and/or interests in Afghanistan: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...-afghanistan-petraeus/articleshow/6109322.cms
    http://www.thehindu.com/news/intern...h-India-on-AfPak-Petraeus/article16372174.ece

    In general, it appears Trump is simply being surrounded by candidates with the exact same thought-process as the Democrat-supported characters.
     
    randomradio and BlackOpsIndia like this.
  3. IndiranChandiran

    IndiranChandiran 2nd Lieutant FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2017
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    484
    Country Flag:
    India
    If they go after Iran & there are many signs to say the incumbent US admin will, it's biz as usual with Pakistan.

    I wonder why do we think Pakistan is a universal problem.Don't get me wrong .That they are but if in spite of a 30 year proxy war they've waged on us , beginning in the Punjab , progressing to J & K & from there to mainland India , we haven't drafted a National Security Doctrine on Internal Security, our armed forces are tasked with fighting a defensive war against them & have prepared accordingly , being perennially underarmed, etc etc - we have nobody but ourselves to blame for the current state of events .

    If we aspire for great power status , we will have to deal with Pak one way or another ON OUR OWN & PRONTO, for the China Pak nexus is soon catching us in a vise like grip from which it will be increasingly difficult to extricate ourselves.
     
    Wolfpack and Sathya like this.
  4. cloud4000

    cloud4000 FULL MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2016
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    19
    Country Flag:
    United States
    Trump seems like the kind of person who wants people who think like him and has his world view. He's going to appoint someone similar to Flynn, but with less political baggage. I pretty much doubt relations with India will be affected by this change.
     

Share This Page